top of page
Top
tumblr_nczjonajcN1qg5xq9o1_1280.jpg

The Journal of Revolution and Liberation

Volume 1, Issue 2 (July 2018): "The Meaning of Revolution"

Cover art: "AFRO-Spiritual", by Jalan Harris

Contents
Slide6.JPG

Flow C: Reparation of the Self

9. "Where the Flowers Blossom", by Justin Moultrie

 

EDITORIAL SUMMARY: "The Meaning of Revolution"

The second issue of the Journal of Revolution and Liberation can be best summarised by a quote from a visit in July 2018 by the great Mutabaruka to the Bahamas; he said:

‘Revolution a no big word ya know. All revolution mean is change.’

In this issue of JRevLib, our contributors explore the multi-faceted nature and meaning of revolutionary change. From these collective works we are guided to a conclusion that revolution must as a priority focus on the dismantling of historically oppressive mechanisms of resource land (dis)ownership, since, as discussed by Dion Hanna in ‘Free the Land’, landlessness is integral to the continued impoverishment and disempowerment of ordinary working people particularly in the global South. Additionally, in Travis Sweeting’s article ‘A Political Game: Divide and Conquer’ we see in real-time and real-life the tragic impact of political gamesmanship on land security in marginalised communities in so-called ‘shanty towns’ in the Bahamas.

We also publish here for the first time, in the People’s Journal, a SPECIAL EXCLUSIVE 2014 geological report that demonstrates the vast potential of mineral resources in Mayaguana island in the Bahamas: we publish it here for the People to scrutinise, given the reality that any revolutionary and equitable re-distribution and sustainable ownership of natural resources must be research-driven and -informed. This is the beginning of the sustainable utilisation of land and mineral resources for the benefit of the Bahamian people.

In the context of emerging marijuana liberalisation in the Caribbean, we also present a SPECIAL EXCLUSIVE interview, done by Ava Turnquest, of Dr Henry Lowe. Dr Lowe, a world renowned Jamaican medicinal chemist, was the first scientist in the world to patent marijuana for medicinal usage, and is a forerunner in Caribbean biomedicine having patented other traditional Jamaican remedies. In this interview he gives insight into how ownership of marijuana and other plant medicinal resources can aid in the development of the Caribbean region.

In the current issue, we are also pressed to confront historical reality, as explored in a poem by Rheena Riley entitled ‘May you always remember’ which ties historical memory and Truth to Ascension. In tandem, Indira Martin’s submission ‘’The ‘slave diet’ and generational disease’’ explores links between past nutritional stress during the Ma’afa (trans-Atlantic slave trade) and modern day disease in diasporic Africans, ending in a call for a health revolution that includes food access and food justice. Furthermore, Chris Curry’s piece on race in the Bahamas challenges us to abandon the destructive myth of a post-racial Bahamas, in order to look holistically and realistically at race relations, towards the building of a more equitable future for all Bahamians and especially the historically disenfranchised. This theme is continuous with that of Marlon Miller's article, in which he demonstrates the persistence of both systemic and anecdotal racism in sport.  

And yet, we are reminded that reparation and revolution is an act that begins in the Self; the artistic work 'Where the Flowers Blossom' by Justin Moultrie, shows that the Mind is a place where beauty can be produced. In ‘Revolution: an interpretation’ by Arvis Mortimer, we also see that revolution need not necessarily be about violent overthrow, and that it is also about the act of building at many levels: revolutionary change can occur at the level of the Self and the Community. This theme is further explored in a series of art pieces by mixed media artist Jalan Harris, in which the horror of male on male violence in the Caribbean is posed in her piece ‘Murk’, alongside pieces offering the solutions of ‘Umoja’ or ‘unity’, ‘Madonna and child’ and ‘AFRO-Spiritual’; all of these pieces hearken to the concept of ‘Sankofa’ or looking backward to move forward.

Overall the second issue of JRevLib highlights the urgent need for revolutionary reclamation of the historical narrative, as well as of land and natural resources, for the benefit of the People; it is also a call to Reparation in the arenas of Health and the Self. In line with Mutabaruka, our contributors reveal, in synergy, that Revolution is a multi-faceted, multi-tiered pursuit of positive, far-reaching, and complete societal CHANGE towards the Empowerment of the People.

Slide6.JPG
Anchor 1
Anchor 2

 

 

 

Free the Land!: Landlessness, the Imperatives of Plantation
Economies and the Struggle for Social Justice in the Third
World

By Dion Hanna

Dion Hanna is a Bahamian legal scholar, lecturer, researcher and community activist based in the UK.

Summary

This paper explores landlessness and persistent poverty in the context of global inequality and disempowered realities of poor and disenfranchised people and the economic paradigm of the modern plantation economies of  third world countries. Western colonial governance of the  Caribbean, the Americas, Africa and Asia created economic relations between the colonized and the colonizers in which the colonies provided raw materials that fueled the industrial development of the Western world. This colonial model ensured that the masses of ordinary, everyday people in the colonized world were in the main landless and disempowered, relegated to the status of employees and unemployed, whilst oligarchical elites and privileged Western vested interests controlled land and precious resources, creating cycles of poverty, underdevelopment and disenfranchisement. The resultant dynamic of contestation and conflict for land has characterized the heroic resistance of the poor and wretched of the earth. In this regard, the development of organized revolutionary campaigns for grassroots' access to land is explored, demonstrating that revolution is a primal imperative and an inevitable consequence which creates an essential impetus for freeing the land from its oligarchical constraints and creating social justice and empowerment for ordinary everyday people, reversing the paradigm of inequality and injustice which is the legacy and consequence of colonialism and imperialism.

 “the harsh treatment of the underprivileged classes, the unsympathetic poor laws and severe feudal laws, and the indifference with which the rising capitalist class was "beginning to reckon prosperity in terms of pounds sterling, and...becoming used to the idea of sacrificing human life to the deity of increased production”(1)


“It is necessary that the weakness of the powerless is transformed into a force capable of announcing justice. For this to happen, a total denouncement of fatalism is necessary. We are transformative beings and not beings for accommodation”(2)


“It is easy to change the characters in the system, but hard to change the system itself...The Plantation is a total economic system. It binds everyone in its embrace to the one task of executing the will of its owner or owners. And because it is omnipotent and omnipresent in the lives of those living within its confines, it is also a total social institution. Social Relations within the plantation community are determined by the economic organization that governs production”(3)


“Where is the justice of political power if it executes the murderer and jails the plunderer, and then itself marches upon neighboring lands, killing thousands and pillaging the very hills?”(4)

“ And the great owners, who must lose their land in an upheaval, the great owners with access to history, with eyes to read history and to know the great fact: when property accumulates in too few hands it is taken away. And that companion fact: when a majority of the people are hungry and cold they will take by force what they need. And the little screaming fact that sounds through all history: repression works only to strengthen and knit the repressed. The great owners ignored the three cries of history. The land fell into fewer hands, the number of the dispossessed increased, and every effort of the great owners was directed at repression. The money was spent for arms, for gas to protect the great holdings, and spies were sent to catch the murmuring of revolt so that it might be stamped out. The changing economy was ignored, plans for the change ignored; and only means to destroy revolt were considered, while the causes of revolt went on” (5)

Landlessness and persistent poverty have become endemic in a global environment of inequality and the disempowered realities of poor disenfranchised people and has come to characterize the urban and rural plantation economic paradigm of third world economies driven by the historical antecedents and imperatives of modern capitalism (6). As indicated by Dudley Seers, in dealing with the social and economic problems of a particular country, one must, above all else, take into account the social environmentand institutions of a particular area (7).

 

 

 

1 Eric Williams (1944): Capitalism and Slavery. Chapel Hill, N.C, University of North Carolina Press.

2 Paulo Friere (2007): Pedagogy of the Oppressed. New York, Continuum.

3 George Beckford (1972): Persistent Poverty: Underdevelopment in the Plantation Economies of the third World. New York/London, Oxford University Press


4 Khalil Gibran and Joseph Sheban (2010): The Wisdom of Gibran: Aphorisms and maxims. New York, Philosophical Library


5 John Steinbeck (2008): The Grapes of Wrath and Other Writings, 1936-1941. New York, Library
Classics of the United States


6 Franz Fanon (1963): The Wretched of the Earth, Trans. Constance Farrington. New York, Grove
Weidenfeld; (1965): A Dying Colonialism, Trans. Haakon Chevalier. New York, Grove Press; George Beckford (1972) supra; Robert Colls (2007): Identity of England. Oxford, Oxford University Press; Asian Development bank (2009): Urban Poverty in India. New Delhi, B S Books; M. Riad El-Ghonemy (2013): The Crisis of Rural Poverty and Hunger: An Essay on the Complementarily Between Market and Government Land Reform for its Resolution. London, Routledge; John Walter (2014): Crowds and Popular Politics in Early Modern England. Oxford, Manchester University Press

7 Dudley Seers (1967): “ The Limitations of the Special Case” In The Teaching of Development Economics, , Kurt Martin and John Knapp (eds.). London, Frank Cass & Co. Ltd, 1-27

 

It has been pointed out that this is necessary if one is to develop meaningful theories and policies answering the pertinent questions about such an economy (8). In this context, we explore the challenge confronting advocates for social justice and equality of opportunities and the empowerment of ordinary everyday people by freeing the land from exploitative race, class and gender relations which are characterized by the ownership of land resources in the hands of the elite and the multinational corporate universe which defines western models of economic development and underscores the lived realities of the poor and disenfranchised (9), the “ Wretched of the Earth” (10) in a socio-legal historical frame of reference, engaging issues of the complex interaction of race, class and gender in daily lived experiences in a post-colonial, post-modern frame of reference.

 

This is a crucial exercise for those committed to radical and transformative revolutionary change, particularly in the state of global inequality and poverty embraced by modern capitalism and underscores the race, class and gender dimensions of conflict which permeate the liberation process. Landless populations have always been impacted with higher rates of poverty, with large proportions of the extremely poor households falling out of the mainstream of anti-poverty programs and social safety nets (11). It has been pointed out that strong inequalities in land ownership are a significant driving factor in poverty and extreme poverty, with landlessness remaining a reliable and strong indicator of extreme poverty (12).

8 Winston D. Nichols (1969): Barbados: A Case Study of the Plantation Economy. A Thesis submitted to the Faculty of Graduate Studies and Research, McGill University in partial fulfilment of the requirements for the Degree Master of Arts

9 E Wayne Nafziger (1989): Inequality in Africa: Political Elites, Proletariat, Peasants and the Poor. Cambridge, Cambridge University Press ; Michael R. Carter (2000): Land Ownership Inequality and the Income Distribution Consequences of Economic Growth. UNO/World Institute for Economic Development Economics Research Working papers, No. 201. Available Online for Download < https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/4025/00aed5f49cddcb53705693a7f47b56490c7c.pdf > ; Lennart Erickson and Dietrich Vollrath (2004): Dimensions of Land Inequality and Economic Development, IMF Working Paper, African Department, WP/04/158. Available online for download< file:///C:/Users/treccommunity/Downloads/_wp04158.pdf > ; Daron Acemoglu,and Maria Angelica Bautista et. al. (2007): Economic and Political Inequality in Development: The Case of Cundinamarca Columbia. Available Online for download < https://economics.mit.edu/files/3831 > ; Thomas Sankara (2007): Thomas Sankara Speaks: The Burkina Faso Revolution 1983-87. New York, Pathfinder; Michael Lipton (2011): Land Reform in Developing Countries: Property Rights and Property Wrongs. London, Routledge; Josh Ryan Collins and Toby Lloyd et. al. (2017): Rethinking the Economics of Land and Housing. London, Zed Books Ltd. 

10 Franz Fanon (1963) supra.

 

11 S.K. Tariquzzaman (2016): An Analysis of the Extreme Poor’s Experiences of the Contemporary Agrarian Structures in Bangladesh. Dhaka, EEP/Shiree

12 Ibid.

 

In this regard, it has been indicated that landlessness is the best indicator of poverty (13), often being both the cause and manifestation of poverty (14), with the consequence of a “ criminalized politico-economic structure” attributable to a legacy of “ anti-poor political economy” and “ crisis in governance”(15).

In this regard, it has been pointed out that “ economic criminalization” has acted as a powerful catalyst to criminalize all aspects of politics and society, creating a bizarre “ sort of perpetuating exclusion of the excluded” (16). This paradigm of persistent poverty is a core feature of the plantation economies of the third world (17) but increasingly, is becoming a feature of more developed western societies (18). In respect of Bangladesh during the colonial era, it has been pointed out that, under British rule, land distribution and management was a means to avoid and respond to peasant disturbances and to protect colonial revenues (19). In this respect, it has been pointed out that Bangladesh inherited a backward agrarian structure from colonial exploitation and that this played an important role in the persistence of poverty in the country (20). This has left a legacy of a negative correlation between landlessness and poverty, with the extreme poor still
being unable to obtain rights of land ownership because of the nature of rural structures and institutions, with land ownership being important in rural power structures and landlessness increasing and considered to be a key cause of poverty and extreme poverty (21).

13 Md Habibur Rahman and Somprawin Manprasert (2006): “ Landlessness and its Impact on Economic Development: A Case Study on Bangladesh” In Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.2 (2) 54-60. Available online < http://thescipub.com/pdf/10.3844/jssp.2006.54.60 >; Special Correspondent (2007): “ Landlessness, True Indicator of Poverty”, In The Hindu, December 9, 2007. Available Online <http://www.thehindu.com/todays-paper/tp-national/ldquoLandlessness-true-index-of-povertyrdquo/article1489115 C. Twesigye-Bakwatsa and Innocent Ntabana (2007): Poverty Environment Indicators and Strategy for Monitoring Them Within the Framework of EDPRS. Rwanda, Rwanda Environmental Management Authority (REMA). Available Online <https://www.unpei.org/sites/default/files/e_library_documents/Rwanda-PE-Indicators.pdf >

14 Md Habibur Rahman and Somprawin Manprasert (2006): “ Landlessness and its Impact on Economic Development: A Case Study on Bangladesh” In Journal of Social Sciences, Vol.2 (2) 54-60. Available online < http://thescipub.com/pdf/10.3844/jssp.2006.54.60 >

15 Abul Barkat (2004): Poverty and Access to Land in South Asia. Chatham maritime: Bangladesh Country Study, The National Resources Institute, University of Greenwich

16 Abul Barkat (2004) supra.

17 George Beckford (1972) supra.

 

18 John M. Ulimwengu (2006): Persistent and Transitory Poverty Across Locations in the United States. Dissertation Submitted in Partial Fulfilment of the Requirements for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy in Graduate School, University of Ohio. Available Online <https://etd.ohiolink.edu/rws_etd/document/get/osu1154789728/inline >; Erhan Ozdemir and Terry Ward (2010): The persistent Risk of Poverty, Research Note 7/2010. Essex (UK) and Tarki (HU), Applica (BE), European Centre for Social Welfare Policy and Research (AT) and ISER, University of Essex. Available online <file:///C:/Users/treccommunity/Downloads/RN7%20Persistent%20poverty%20Nov%202010%20(1).pdf >; Peter Edelman (2012): “ Poverty in America: Why Can’t We End It” In The New York Times, July 28. Available Online http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/29/opinion/sunday/why-cant-we-end-poverty-in-america.html ; Chloe Cornish (2017): “ Number of Britains in Long Term Poverty Rose in 2015”. In Financial Times 27 June. Available online <https://www.ft.com/content/ebce24f6-5b27-11e7-b553-e2df1b0c3220 > ; Jonathan Walker (2017): “ Increasing Number of People Suffer Misery of Persistent Poverty”. In Birmingham Live. Available online <https://www.birminghammail.co.uk/news/midlands-news/increasing-number-people-suffer-misery-13250301>

19 S.K. Tariquzzaman (2016) supra.

20 A. Abdullah (1976): “ Land Reform and Agrarian Change in Bangladesh” In The Bangladesh
Development Studies, Vol.4 No.1 (January), 67-114 ; S.K. Tariquzzaman (2016) supra.

21 S.K. Tariquzzaman (2016) supra.

In this frame of reference, it has been indicated that economic inequality may be associated with political inequality and that theoretically we may expect economic inequality to lead to political inequality, as the economically powerful become politically influential and with those possessing political power being able to amass greater wealth (22).

In essence, this paradigm ensures a vicious cycle of inequality giving truth to the adage that the “rich get richer and the poor get poorer”, with global economic inequality having worsened over the past four decades, with the wealthiest 1% of the world’s population capturing twice as much income growth as the bottom half (23). In this respect, it has been pointed out that land ownership inequality retards the rate of economic growth and creates low and insecure incomes for the rural poor, thereby retarding human capital accumulation and growth (24). It also argued that this buttresses high and potentially increasing levels of income inequality over time, creating a vicious cycle of growth and inequality (25).

Carter points out that, from a theoretical perspective, there are reasons for thinking that the loose empirical association between exclusionary growth and land inequality is not accidental (26). This confirms Nichols’ contention, in respect of Barbados, that its current social and economic problems and the possibilities and the real constraints of growth can best be understood if we get a clear picture of just how the economy functions, with the determining functional economic relationships being, to a great extent, a legacy of the past, which saw Barbados settled and developed as a plantation economy, which exhibits certain basic and functional and institutional characteristics in Barbados and other Caribbean economies (27). In this context, the Plantation has been described as not only a total economic institution but a total social institution as well for the majority of its residents, with the influence of the Plantation being pervasive and the economy in its structure being inseparable and indistinguishable from the Plantation (28).

22 Rodney Ramcharan (2006): “Inequality and Redistribution: Evidence From US Counties and States 1890-1930. Unpublished International Monetary Fund; Daron Acemoglu, Maria Angelica Bautista and Pablo Querubin et. al. (2007): Economic and Political Inequality in Development: The Case of Cundinamarca Colombia. National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper No. 13208. Available online <https://economics.mit.edu/files/3831>

23 Los Angeles Times December 15, 2017 “ Policies Helping the Rich Get Richer and the Poor get Poorer Report Says”. Available online < http://www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-income-inequality-20171215-story.html >

24 K. Deininger and L. Squire (1998): “ New Ways of Looking at Old Issues” In Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 57 (2), 259-87; K. Deininger and P. Olinto (1999): “ Is Broad Asset Growth Good For Growth? Panel Evidence From 62 Countries”. World Bank Working Papers; Michael R. Carter (2000): Land Ownership inequality and the Income Distribution Consequences of Economic Growth. Helsinki, UNU and WIDER,Working papers No. 201; P. Keefer and S. Knack (2002): “ Polarization, Politics and Property Rights: Links Between Inequality and Growth” In Public Choice Vol. 111 (1-2) 127-54

25 N. D. Birdsall, D. Ross and R. Sabot (1995): “ Inequality and Growth Reconsidered: Lessons From East Asia” In World Bank Economic Review, Vol. 9 (3) 477-508

26 Michael R. Carter (2000) supra.

27 Winston D. Nichols (1969) supra.

28 A. Smith (2015): The Wealth of Nations, A Translation Into Modern English. Lewis F. Abbott (ed.) Manchester, Industrial Systems Research; Winston D. Nichols (1969) supra.

Nichols points out that a plantation economy constitutes a single part of a much wider system, which consists of a centre or metropolis and one or more marginal units known as hinterlands (29). In this regard, it has been indicated that the British Empire was visualized as a large commercial unit consisting of England, Scotland, Ireland and the Plantations as separate but co-operative compliments, with commercial relations being of a complimentary not of a competitive character (30). In this context, the Plantation economy has been described as a “ total institution” (31).

In respect of landlessness in Colombia, it has been contended that inequality has not been merely economic in scope but rather, part of a more complex socio-political structure of exclusion that locked peasants into unfair labour contracts and unequal standing before the law (32). In southern Africa, this is manifest in an intense conflict over land which pits tens of thousands of white landholders who are “ beneficiaries of a system” that denied Black people of property rights against “ millions of non-whites left landless by colonialism” (33). In this paradigm, 9 out of every 10 acres of commercial farm land remain in the hands of 50,000 white farmers (34). It has been pointed out, in respect of South Africa, various laws were enacted to justify encroachment and to control and deprive traditional communities of their land, including the Native Land Act (No.27 of
1013) and the Native Trust and Land Act (No.18 of 1936)
(35). It has been indicated that Africa’s relative poverty at the end of the 20th century was a direct impact of the form taken by European colonialism on the continent (36). This paradigm of colonial extraction of resources for economic development in the Western world was manifest in the “appropriation of land for European settlers or plantations” which provided the European settlers with cheap and secure control of the land and obliged the native colonized peoples to provide cheap labour for European farmers, planters and mine owners (37).

29 Winston D. Nichols (1969) supra.

30 K.E. Knorr (1944): British Colonial Theories 1570-1850. Toronto, University of Toronto Press. C/f R. Pares (1937): “ The Economic Factors in the History of the Empire” In The Economic History Review, Vol.vii, No.2 (May); C. M. Andrews (1938): The Colonial Period in American History, Vol.4 England’s Commercial and Colonial Policy. New Haven, Yale University Press; Winston D. Nichols (1969) supra.

31 George Beckford (1972) supra.

32 Thomas Edward Flores (2013): “ 200 Years of Landlessness?: Land Inequality and the Search for Peace in Colombia” In Stockholm International Peace Research Institute, 28 August. Available online https://www.sipri.org/commentary/blog/2013/200-years-landlessness-land-inequality-and-search-peace-colombia

33 Sharon Lefranier and Michael Wines (2004): “ African Quandary: Whites’ land vs the Landlessness of Blacks” In The New York Times, January 6 th

34 Ibid.

35 Freddie Samuelson Khunou (2011): “ Traditional Leadership and Governance: Legislative Environment and Policy Development in a Democratic South Africa” In International Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, Vol1, No.9 July (Special issue)

36 Walter Rodney (1972): How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. London, Bougle-L’Overture; Daron Acemoglu, Simon Johnson and James A. Robinson (2002): An African Success Story: Botswana. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 3219. London, Centre for Economic policy Research; (2002): “ Reversal of Fortune: Geography and Institutions in the Making of the Modern World Income Distribution” In Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.117, No.4; Gareth Austin (2010): “ African Economic Development and Colonial Legacies” In International Policy Development Review Vol.1, 11-32. Available online https://journals.openedition.org/poldev/78

37 Robin Palmer and Neil parsons (eds.) (1977): The Roots of Rural Poverty in Central and Southern Africa. London, Heinemann; Gareth Austin (2010) supra.

It has been contended that although equality is not conducive to economic development when growth is driven by “physical capital accumulation”, it “fosters it when growth is driven by human capital accumulation” (38). In this regard, it has been pointed out that the unequal concentration of political and economic power arising from the the “ Reconquista across Spanish Provinces” had negative consequences in GDP per capita in 2005 (39). Further, it has been indicated that land reform schemes can be beneficial to agricultural productivity (40). In an analysis of the effect of and reforms in India from 1958-1992, it was found that states with a greater share of land redistribution experienced a decline in poverty and a rise in agricultural wages (41). Further, in a study of 117 countries between 1949-1994, it was found that greater inequality in operational farm size was accompanied with lower productivity and that more equitable land redistribution schemes can enhance agricultural productivity (42). Nevertheless, it has been indicated that the issue of who land belongs to continues to “ haunt discussions” (43).

In this context, it has been asserted that the tendency of colonial apologists to project their own (European) models and concepts of land tenure onto African societies has hindered our understanding of development and change in this area, with ethnocentric and ideological biases and their attendant political agendas distorting much of the literature (44). It has been pointed out that, in the post-colonial era in most African societies, the colonial pattern of land tenure has been continued, with little or no determined effort to redress the situation of native African people, particularly rural people who have been relegated to a state of landlessness, as is the situation in Eastern Africa, with Africans remaining dispossessed of land which is their “historical, ancestral,
spiritual, cultural and economic heritage”(45).

38 O. Galor and J. Ziera (1993): “ Income Distribution and and Macroeconomics” In Review of Economic Studies. Vol. 60(1) 35-52; O. Galor and O. Moav (2003): “ From Physical to Human Capital Accumulation: Inequality and the Process of Development” In The Review of Economic Studies Vol. 71(4) 1001-1026; Theresa Finley, Raphael Franck and Noel D. Johnson (2017): The Affects of Land Redistribution: Evidence From the French Revolution. Available online http://noeldjohnson.net/noeldjohnson.net/Home_files/RevConfiscations10-10-17.pdf >

39 D, Oto-Peralias and d. Romero-Avila (2016): “ The Economic Consequences of the Spanish Reconquest: The Long Term Effects of Medieval Conquest and Colonization” In Journal of Economic Growth Vol. 21(4) 409-464; Theresa Finley, Raphael Franck and Noel D. Johnson (2017) supra.

 

40 H. P, Binswanger, K. Deininger and G. Feder (1995): “ Power Distortions, revolt and Reform in Agricultural land Relations” In Handbook of Development Economics Vol.3, 2659-2772; T. Besley and R. Burgess (2000): “ Land Reform, Poverty Reduction and Growth: Evidence From India” The Quarterly Journal of Economics Vol. 115(2) 389-430; M. Goldstein and C. Udry (2008): “ The profits of Power: Land Rights and Agricultural Investments in Ghana” In Journal of Political Economy Vol. 116(6) 981-1022; J. Fenske (2011): Land Tenure and Investment Incentives: Evidence From West Africa Vol.95(2) 137-156; Theresa Finley, Raphael Franck and Noel D. Johnson (2017) supra.

41 T. Besley and R. Burgess (2000) supra.

42 D. Vollrath (2007): “ Land Distribution and International Agricultural Productivity” In American Journalof Agricultural Economics Vol.89(1) 202-216

43 Brenda Schoeppe (2018): “ Do We Need a French Revolution” In Canadian Cattlemen February 6

44 Thomas J. Bassett (1993): “ Introduction: the Land Question and Agricultural Transformation in Sub-Saharan Africa” In Thomas J, Bassett and Donald E. Crummey (eds.) Land in African Agrarian Systems. Madison, WI/London University of Wisconsin University Press

45 Emeka E. Obioha (2013): “ Changing Land Reforms and Conflict Over Land in Sub-Saharan Africa” In Journal of Human Ecology, Vol.44, No.3 (January) 207-22

Figues asserts that there are profound cultural reasons for peasants to oppose the break up of the commune, which has been the “focus of their lives for centuries”, with their basic concern being that giving some peasants the right to own part of the communal land or to “own it privately in perpetuity” would deprive others of access to the land as their basic means of livelihood (46). This conflict between customary law and the official legal system is underscored by the fears of younger members of the family, especially women, that once families consolidated their lands as private property, family ownership ceased to function and the land became the private property of the elder, who could bequeath it to one or more of his sons and thereby depriving other family
members of their inheritance (47). Another more potent fear is revealed in Figues’ contention that allowing communal land to become private property would allow the richest members to buy it all (48).

In this respect, it has been pointed out that the place of land in the various conflict situations recorded in the African continent cannot be underestimated, with contestation over land never being a situation that is taken for granted, with land being central to most liberation struggles (49). Obioha asserts that, irrespective of reasons that may be adduced by social researchers as the main causes of conflict in Africa, it is “very evident” that the root causes of most conflicts is “contestation over land and land resources in the rural and urban space” (50).

In an Amazonian Brazilian context but equally relevant in a wider Third World frame of reference, it has been pointed out that with the “ backdrop” of an often “ ambiguous and often contradictory legal system and biased law enforcement” many landless farmers in their “ quest for land” have begun to “ take the law into their own hands” (51). It has been indicated that the “ sense of unification behind a common community purpose is crucial to the success of the revolution”(52). As asserted by Fanon, the “ naked truth” of decolonization “ evokes for us the searing bullets and bloodstained knives which emanate from it” (53). He points out that:

“ For if the last shall be first, this will only come to pass after a murderous and decisive struggle between the two protagonists. That affirmed intention to place the last at the head of things and to make them climb at a pace (too quickly some say) the well known steps which characterize an organized society, can only triumph if we use all means to turn the scale, including, of course, that of violence” (54).

46 O. Figues (1997): A Peoples’ Tragedy: The Russian Revolution, 1891-1924. London, Pimlico

47 Ibid.

48 Emeka E. Obioha (2013) supra.

49 Ibid.

50 Ibid.

51 Nicolette Burford (1993): “ A Grass-Roots Response to Landlessness in Rondonia, Brazil” In RDFN
Network Paper 16e, Winter, 1-7

52 Franz Fanon (1952): Black Skin, White Masks. Markmann C.L. (trans.) Chippenham U.K., Grove Press; Josh Pallas (2016): “ Fanon -Revolution” In Critical Legal Thinking 22 January. Available online < http://criticallegalthinking.com/2016/01/22/fanon-revolution/>

53 Fanon (1963) supra.


54 Ibid.

In respect of Colombia, Flores points out that peasants’ struggles for land rights often turned violent, as large landowners in conjunction with local authorities used force to expropriate squatters from disputed land, with these struggles becoming metastasized as peasants created armed groups to defend their land rights (55). Similar violent resistance is manifest in Southern Africa, where since 1991 there have been 1500 white farmers killed and in the KwaZulu Natal province, this conflict between the landless and minority landholding elites has escalated to what has been described as “ low level guerrilla warfare”, with the white farmers employing security guards and “ ringing off their farms with trenches to fend off attacks by peasants”(56). This has been catalyzed by a “ fast growing political movement” called the Landless Peoples Movement threatening to take over white owned farms from 2005 and squatter invasions of farmland being a daily occurrence, with similar initiatives in Zimbabwe, where paramilitary militias and peasants making seizure of most of the white owned farmlands (57). This increase in peasant militancy for land empowerment is also manifest in Brazil, where over the past 25 years there has been a significant increase in landless workers joining the Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra (Landless’ Workers Movement) that agitates for peasants’ land rights and the largest social movement in Latin America, in a country where 3% of the population owns two thirds of all workable arable land (58).

Marcella Via declares that Movimento dos Trabalhadores Rurais Sem Terra and Ejercito Zapatista de Liberacion Nacional (EZLN) (Zapatista Army of National Liberation):

 

“ are two peasant movements that mobilised to write a new revolutionary chapter of history, where human rights and dignity were over profit, globalisation and private property.


While the movement globally was about privatisation and commodification, you have these two movements which criticise the sanctity of private property and say ‘land should not be private property, land is the basis of life. It is not because you control land as private property that you are allowed to exploit us and impede us from having access to land”. (59)

 

 


55 Thomas Edward Flores (2013) supra.

56 Sharon Lefranier and Michael Wines (2004) supra.

57 Ibid.

58 Hannah Smith and Iain Overton (2011): “ The Rise and Rise of the Landless Movement in Brazil” In The Bureau of Investigative Journalism, December 23.

59 Marcella Via (2017): “ Land and revolution in Mexico and Brazil” In ThePrisma, August 14. Available online < http://theprisma.co.uk/2017/08/14/land-and-revolution-in-mexico-and-brazil/>

Via points out that the Zapatistas also confront the state and that they are talking about revolution and radical change and assert that history is about struggling for a better world. In this regard, she points out that both movements challenge traditional gender relations, with the Zapatistas declaring that there was a revolution within the revolution which was the revolution of the indigenous woman that asked for equal rights within the organisation and in their communities (60).

This confirms Fanon’s analysis, in a colonial context, that the “ violence which has ruled over the ordering of the colonial world” will be “ claimed and taken over” by the native at the moment when “ deciding to embody history in his own person he surges into forbidden quarters”, with the destruction of the colonial zone being “ no less than the abolition of one zone” with its “ burial being in the depths of the earth or its expulsion from the country” (61). This strident militancy and upsurge in new peasant rebellions, with peasants in Mexico, Ecuador, Bolivia, Paraguay. Chile and Brazil, collectively contesting power structures that buttress social, political and economic exclusion, has been described as a central feature of contemporary Latin America (62). As succinctly put by Thomas Sankara, you cannot carry out fundamental change without a certain amount of “ madness” and this flows from “ non conformity”, courage to turn you backs on “ old formulas” and to “ invent the future”(63). As declared by Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara, “ Revolution. in history”, is like the “ doctor assisting at the birth of a new life” who will “ not use forceps” unless
“ necessary” but will utilize them “ without hesitation every time labor requires them” as it is “ a labor bringing the hope of a better life to the enslaved and exploited masses” (64). This confirms Fanon’s assessment that the decolonization process sets out to change the order of the world and is obviously a program of “ complete disorder” with the real leap consisting of “introducing invention into existence” reinventing self and moving beyond the “ historical instrumental hypothesis” to initiate a “ cycle of freedom” (65).

60 Ibid.

61 Franz Fanon (1963) supra.

62 Wildre Roblles (2012): “ Peasants Speak: The Landless Rural Workers Movement (MST) in Brazil” In Journal of Peasant Studies, Vol. 28 (2) Available online <https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/03066150108438769>

63 Sean Jacobs (2008): “ Sankara: Daring to Invent Africa’s Future” In The Guardian, 18 October. Available online <https://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2008/oct/15/thomassankara-burkinafaso >; Vanguard (2015): “ Exhuming Thomas Sankara and History of His Revolution” In Vanguard News, June 2. Available online <https://www.vanguardngr.com/2015/06/exhuming-thomas-sankara-and-history-of-his-revolution/>; Amber Murrey (2017): “ remembering Thomas Sankara on the 30th Anniversary of His Assassination” In Pambazuka News, October 19. Available online <https://www.pambazuka.org/democracy-governance/remembering-thomas-sankara-30th-anniversary-his-assassination>

64 Ernesto ‘Che’ Guevara (1964) Guerrilla Warfare: A Method. Cuba, Foreign Languages Press. Available online < https://www.marxists.org/archive/guevara/1963/09/guerrilla-warfare.htm>


65 Fanon (1963) supra.

It should be noted that, as we are advised by Thomas Sankara, that revolutions that occur all over the world are not all alike and that each revolution presents original features which distinguishes it from the others. He asserts that it is no longer enough to call oneself a “ revolutionary” and that we need to be absolutely clear on the profound meaning of “ revolution” (66). However, Rosa Luxemburg provides the rational basis for revolution when she declares that people who pronounce themselves in “ favour of the method of legislative reform” in place of and in contradistinction to the “ conquest of political power and social revolution” do not really choose a “ more tranquil, calmer and slower road to the same goal” but a “ different” goal. Rather than taking a stand for the establishment of a new society they take a stand for “ surface modifications of the old society” (67). As Camus indicates, revolution in order to be creative cannot do “ without either a moral or metaphysical role to balance the insanity of history”68. The insanity of history has been punctuated by the obscene concentration of land and natural resources in the hands of a few while the majority remain landless and disempowered. In this regard, it is important to bear in mind the observation by Malcolm X that revolution is based on land, with land being the basis o  independence and the basis of freedom,equality and justice (69).

Hence it is clear. In our quest for a new paradigm reversing the global manifestation of landlessness and disempowerment, revolution is an inevitable path to freeing the land and creating social justice and empowerment for ordinary, everyday people. This is an essential process and a primal imperative, transcending the corrupt world of inequality and injustice forged in the obscenely foul womb of colonialism and imperialism. Le Guin asserts that you cannot buy the revolution and you cannot make the revolution, but you must be the revolution, as it is either in your spirit or it is nowhere (70). As Arundhati Roy declares, our strategy should not be to merely confront empire but to “ lay siege to it”, to “ deprive it of oxygen”, to “ shame” and “ mock” it:

 

“ With our art, our music, our literature, our stubbornness, our joy, our brilliance, our sheer relentlessness – and our ability to tell our own stories. Stories that are different from the ones we’re being brainwashed to believe....The corporate revolution will collapse if we refuse to buy what they are selling – their ideas, their version of history, their wars, their weapons, their notion of inevitability...Remember this: We be many and they be few. They need us more than we need  hem...Another world is not only possible, she is on her way. On a quiet day, I can hear her breathing”. (71).

 

 

 

66 Thomas Sankara (2007): We are the Heirs of the Worlds’ Revolutions: Speeches From the Burkina Faso Revolution. New York, Pathfinder

67 Rosa Luxemburg (1972): Selected Political Writings. Robert Looker (ed.). London, Jonathan Cape

68 Albert Camus (1956): The Rebel: An Essay on Man in Revolt. New York, Knopf

69 Malcolm X and George Breitman (1990): Malcolm X Speaks: Selected Speeches and Statements. New York, Grove Weidenfeld

70 Ursula K. Le Guin (1975): The Dispossessed. New York, Avon​


71 Arundhati Roy (2003): Arundhati Roy's War Talk. West Layfayette, C-Span Archives (video)
 

 

Malcolm X points out that the only way we will get freedom for ourselves is to identify ourselves with every oppressed people in the world and that we are blood brothers to the people of Brazil, Venezuela, Haiti and Cuba (72). This confirms the reality that it takes a revolution to make a solution and as Ernesto 'Che' Guevara, I am of the firm conviction that “ if you tremble with indignation at every injustice, then you are a comrade of mine” (73).

Fuller contends, you never change things by fighting the existing reality and that, in order to change something, you must build a new model that makes the existing model obsolete (74). This revolutionary imperative entails a rejection of paradigms grounded in colonialism and imperialism and fidelity to cultural traditions of equality and justice. As declared by Amilcar Cabral:

 

“A people who free themselves from foreign domination will be free culturally only if, without complexes and without underestimating the importance of positive accretions from oppressor and other cultures, they return to the upward paths of their own culture, which is nourished by the living reality of its environment, and which negates both harmful influences and any kind of subjection to foreign culture. Thus, it may be seen that if imperialist domination has the vital need to practice cultural oppression, national liberation is necessarily an act of culture”. (75)

 

 


72 Malcolm X (2014): Words of Wisdom: Malcolm X. Morrisville N.C., Lulu.com

73 Treishan Latner (2005): The Quotable Rebel: Political Quotations for Dangerous Times. Common
Courage Press

74 R. Buckmaster Fuller and James Meller (1970): The Buckmaster Fuller Reader. London, Cape

75 Amilcar Cabral (1975): Return to the Source: Selected Speeches by Amilcar Cabral. African
Information Service (ed.) New York/London. Monthly Review Press

Slide6.JPG

 

 

 

 

A Political Game: Divide and Conquer

By Travis T. Sweeting

Travis T. Sweeting is the founder and editor-in-chief of Brutha Magazine. He is avid reader, world traveller and hopeless romantic. 

Summary

"A Political Game: Divide and Conquer" sheds light on the possible political game being drawn on a marginalized subset of people while suggesting better solutions to correcting the problem of shanty towns in The Bahamas.

 

 

This year we’re celebrating 45 years in an independent Bahamas. A country where we pride ourselves on being a “Christian” nation - whatever that means - that always act and intervenes in the “best interest” of its people. But do we really?

 

In a welcomed turn of events, I was invited to tag along with Rights Bahamas in visits to a couple of “Haitian communities” post government notice to tear down their homes. I spent my independence morning speaking with mothers, fathers, daughters, brothers, sisters and elderly persons older than our independent country.

 

We were welcomed with opened arms into their yards, homes and community life. Offered plates of delicious food, treats and bottled water from their shops, I got a true opportunity to recognise them for who they truly are: working poor, tax-paying citizens trying to survive in a country seemingly only befitting of the political elite and the blue-eyed foreigners they cater to.

 

It’s easy to feed into the narrative that these are vile, uncivilised people but that could not be further than the truth. These Shanty Town communities produce people like the elder man I met, a coal manufacturer, who built a house from the ground up for a maimed man with no family or way to defend for himself; the active father of five, who now is faced with finding a new home for his family on a minimum wage salary; the young lady who bootstrapped to earn her associates degree but has no real job opportunities; or the countless entrepreneurs who sell grocery, food, coal, fruits and veggies. Striving folk, parallel to a lot of the Bahamians living in other areas such as Kemp Road, Bain and Grants Town, Englerston and the like. What I saw was traces of a Black Wall Street that can be nurtured and expanded for all to enjoy. Or are we too blinded by hatred for Haitians in general?

 

Albeit, the big question remains, as it relates to the upheaval of Shanty Towns, why now?

 

The government is playing a game with people’s lives. Shanty towns are not new. Some residents built their homes well over 20 years with documented agreements with government institutions such as BEC, Town and Physical Planning department of the Ministry of Works, and then-Bahamas Telecommunications Corporation, now BTC. 

 

Rather than subject these human beings to belittling action of uprooting families, we as a people must demand that humanity is provided for a community that has for ages contributed to our nations economic pie.  In hindsight, the government should:

 

Attack the actual land owners

 

Yes, the residents built their homes but none of them own the land on which they stand. One letter I saw from a father of four, who inherited his home from his late father and mother, was dated May 1st 1989 - 29 years ago -outlining a land lease to build a home issued by a Bishop Edna Butler of the Mother Butler Mission. 

 

Why are we silent on who owns the land? Why are we not going after them for benefitting on the backs of the impoverished? I believe this should be the first step in dealing with this situation. 

 

Provide alternative housing options

 

It’s not enough to say you are unhappy with shanty towns, form a committee and issue destruction notices and deadlines to families without any sound solutions. If the government wishes to do away with shanty towns for whatever reason they have then they must provide alternative housing options such as a build and lease programme or moving stipends. Many of these residents have spent up to $150,000 building their homes for it to just be heartlessly torn down without a valid reason other than it doesn’t look good. 

 

Cease trying to make a dollar out of fifty cents

 

The true motive of this shanty town push has not been uncovered but one thing remains clear that this present government is all about making working poor people carry this country. Lets be honest, soon enough we won’t have a middle class as income inequality persists in The Bahamas. 

 

Could it be that we’re forcing them out of their life’s work to get them to build or buy all over again, essentially pulling more money out of their purses to spend with businesses and to government agencies? But if the government’s objective is to somehow make more money then they need to turn to income tax for those who earn over $30,000 yearly. Unless, that’s too close to their own doorsteps? 

 

Naturalise foreign-parent born citizens at birth

 

We tend to automatically think about Haitians when we say illegal immigrants but there are many other immigrant nationalities that exist within our borders. So what is the reason? That we feel they are poorer than the Chinese or Americans, darker than the Filipinos or more abundant than the Cubans and Jamaicans? 

 

Reality is, many of these Haitian residents were born here but held captive until 18 years old by an antiquated law that requires them to apply for citizenship thereafter. In a modern Bahamas, this should not be so. Life would be easier for them to transition into adulthood if this very thing was not hanging onto their heads. It embraces a cycle of poverty because of the many opportunities that they can miss during developmental years.

 

Take ownership

 

The government has left out pertinent information when reporting to the public. Like how is it that almost every resident have stamped Physical Planning records for their dwellings or bills in their name from government-owned utility companies. How is it that you can lay claim they are encroaching when you’ve gladly taken their money for decades? It’s time for the government to take ownership of the situation in one of two ways: build and lease homes to their liking for these residents to occupy or reimburse them for every fee, utility and building material they bought into.

 

As a [former] British colony, I get it. Divide and rule, a very old political strategy, was the Brits go-to mantra for taking care of their enemies. What it does is to divide and isolate populations to make it impossible for them to come together and fight against the sovereign authority. I believe this is exactly the strategy being rolled out today  but not only to Shanty Town residents, but all subsets of Bahamians. It’s just their day.

 

I understand too our country is almost always reactive versus proactive but basic human rights should not be an afterthought ever. I implore the government to sit down with the necessary parties and draft a more decent solution to eradicating shanty towns, in particular one that does not include eradicating the livelihoods of our brothers and sisters rather improving it. 

Slide6.JPG
Anchor 3

 

 

 

 

Rock mining in Mayaguana Island, The Bahamas

Summary

In this Journal of Revolution and Liberation EXCLUSIVE, we publish for the very first time a 2014 report prepared by expert consultants, on the potential for mining limestone rock in Mayaguana. The experts conclude that there is considerable opportunity to sustainably mine limestone rock in Mayaguana. We publish this report in the context of a increased taxation on working class people in the Bahamas. The government's rhetoric has suggested that taxation is the only option, and yet a Truth is slowly unravelling: that despite the colonial narrative, the Bahamas has an abundance of natural resources. Furthermore, these resources are held in large part by foreign and local oligarchical interests, without overall benefit to the People. Therefore, here in the People's journal, we publish this never-before seen report in order to challenge the neo-imperial narrative that the Bahamas lacks natural resources. Furthermore, we publish this report as a contribution to research-based and sustainable resource utilisation, as a central pillar in the economic liberation of the People of the Bahamas.

 ab

Slide6.JPG
Anchor 4

 

 

 

 

Interview: Dr Henry Lowe

with Ava Turnquest

(transcribed by Farah Johnson)

Summary

Dr Henry Lowe is a world-renowned Jamaican scientist, and his company Medicanja Limited is the first medical cannabis company in Jamaica and the CARICOM region. The company uses plant and natural resources to manufacture cosmeceuticals, nutraceuticals and pharmaceuticals products. He and his team of researchers developed a drug to treat acute myeloid leukemia (AML), which was granted orphan-drug designation by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in 2017. He speaks with Bahamian journalist Ava Russell-Turnquest on his journey, the global and regional shift on cannabis prohibition, and his belief the industry could be harnessed by the region as catalyst for economic growth.

Jamaican scientist Dr Henry Lowe

 

AR-T: “I really want to get a sense of the journey for both Jamaica and yourself, and I guess we could start there and work our way to the other themes that I wanted to cover like modern Caribbean medicine and the blending of old practices of the diaspora.”

 

“But to start, for you personally what made you take this course and stick with it? You’re at the forefront of the industry now and obviously it was because of your early work, and that work would’ve been very progressive even a decade ago.

 

“What was the impetus for you - specifically for cannabis?”

 

DR LOWE: “Well this whole thing started from high school days because I was always one who felt that our scientists -the scientists in developing countries - should not be overspecialized because there are so many issues to be addressed in development that one needs to find a broad niche and do work there which can create wealth and development for the country.”

 

“And this has been the sort of guiding principle from high school and I went through university where I was trained in the University of the West Indies in Natural Sciences and then onto University of Sydney in Australia where I did medicinal pharmaceuticals chemistry and then onto University of Manchester where I did my doctorate maintaining the same interests.”

 

“Going off course, returning to Jamaica, in different periods, I never let go of the natural products research despite the fact that there was this broad ban on cannabis for many many years it was my view that we (Jamaica) pursue cannabis use particularly for medicinal purposes. Despite the big push what you see about people using it for recreational purposes -which it is so- and in fact, this is where Jamaica got its brand name as being the best cannabis in the world.”

 

“But the under belly of all this has been the cultural linkages with the medicinal uses. We did a survey which showed that culturally even the smoking -before it became commercialized with the tourists- even the smoking was related to medicinal uses and the use of kief has a broad based use for several different ailments and the smoking was really for asthma and other respiratory diseases.”

 

“So the basic underlying features of Jamaican cannabis industry has really been medicinal and because of tourism naturally, the recreational side of smoking really got a big boost and then illegal export because people want it more and more of it.”

 

“So that has been the sort of background. At the University of the West Indies myself and Professor (Manley) West and later on Professor (Albert) Lockhart who was an ophthalmologist, he came on the scene later, but West and I found very interesting observation in that we found that fishermen were able to see very much better at night. We don’t know the reason for that in terms of their fishing, and also that the people who use cannabis seldom ever had glaucoma or if they had glaucoma it would go away.”

 

“It led us to investigate and in 1972 through to 1980 we did a number of animal experiments which verified the observation and this led us to the development of Canasol which was the first eye-drop, one, but secondly and most important, the first commercial product ever from cannabis.”

 

“Despite all the fights and everything else, we got the support of the police and the politicians of the day because they saw where we wanted to go and they supported us. So that was the start and then other products have been developed but the big problem is, which is just a little better now, but we still have problems.”

 

“We were able to develop a number of products but could not get them marketed and sold because of the ban although they were purely for medicinal purposes. We put our faith in God on what’s going on now in the United States and most places I don’t know if you saw that in the UK.”

 

AR-T: “Yes I saw the recent legislation change.”

 

DR LOWE: “Two weeks ago, yeah.”

 

“But what a lot of people don’t realize in this whole thing is a lot of hypocrisy is there. Let me say why I say this. The UK is the largest exporter of cannabis, I bet you didn’t know that. In the United States we have all these states that are developing and doing their own thing, it’s not legal federally but they are still doing it.”

 

“But the poor developing countries are really held back. We are struggling in Jamaica to make sure that we develop our industry and be ready for the take off because it’s going to come and I think it’s going to come within the next two years.”

 

AR-T: “Do you mean US federal rollback, the end of prohibition?”

 

DR LOWE: “Yes I think so. And more and more countries as you look, literally every month, another country is legalizing or allowing medicinal. So my estimate is within 2 years it will be free but guess what, I still think that there will be a hold back on the recreational side because that’s where the problem really started and I have no problem with that.

 

“But I think like most people, the medicinal side needs to be taken forward because there is more than enough evidence that it can work. I don’t know if you saw recently that GW Pharmaceuticals out of the UK just got FDA approval for a product for epilepsy.”

 

“Now we have developed a product also but we haven't got the financial muscle to do a lot of the clinical studies that they did but we have enough evidence anecdotally as well as we have scientific evidence that these things work.”

 

“So it’s really for us to keep fighting and getting investors which, we would welcome investors now especially from the Caribbean because at the launch I did say that one of my new interests and thrust is to get people in the Caribbean.”

 

“We talk about relationships and how we want to develop each other but we’re not doing it and I feel like this is a great opportunity because it’s something which is good and for good.”

 

“And that’s my goal, that’s one of my primary goals at this stage.”

 

AR-T: “Don’t you think it takes political will though?”

 

DR LOWE: “In the middle of all of this, look at the opioids, let’s take pain for example. Pain management is one of the biggest industries in the world. From you getting a headache, to migraines, to you name it, and it’s now destroying people. It’s the biggest source of drug abuse in the world and millions of people are going under.”

 

“It’s far worse than anything else that there is. Guess what? We have now developed several products for pain management without that side effect.  And we are doing a lot of research also to see how some of these cannabis products can replace those products that are being used with opioids.”

 

“So it’s not just a matter of making products but we’re also doing research to ensure that we join the word in developing a better mousetrap so to speak for the products.”

 

AR-T: “There are different movements within Caribbean medicine with, at times, conflicting ideologies. There are certain groups that feel as though the new or modern Caribbean philosophy towards biomedicine that they’re arguing against the use of patents and more towards traditional medicine. Do you feel as though this is the only way for Caribbean nationals to really take ownership and have a stake in this new environment where big Pharma is now turning back to plant medicine and traditional medicine”

 

DR LOWE: “You’ve got it right, in fact I am so glad you said that because what a lot of people don't realize is up until 1960 roughly 70 percent of all medications came directly or indirectly from plants and to a lesser extent, animals.”

 

“But that was the basis of where the synthetic chemist came in and they began to design drugs and what we’re finding now is that though some of them are quite effective, sometimes they kill the patient before having the cure, and even when the patient is not killed they develop a lot of side effects which sometimes even trigger even new types of diseases and ailments that they didn’t have before.”

 

“So it is a big dilemma it’s not talked about, but when you look at our traditional medicines and in fact, herbal medicines, yes there is a problem according to -well it’s not just them- but there is a real problem because nobody has developed the standardization. Nobody knows exactly what is in some of the medicines.”

 

“People use them and they work but in modern times we should be able to say exactly what it is and even without having it in single molecules as the FDA and others would like, we could still know what is in there. What are the major bioactive ingredients, so that we could make better medicines from these.”

 

AR-T: “What would you say to The Bahamas because we’re behind Trinidad and even Barbados is further along as they have at least made a declaration that they’re going to do this. We’re still in our consultative phase. Is there anything to fear? Can doctors now  have more confidence that they can get into this area of medicine?”

 

DR LOWE: “Absolutely, the time has passed. We can understand doctors having reservations because they were trained in the classical way to have pharmaceutical details given to them, and then they use it as a prescription. Nobody has detailed the products from cannabis for health care purposes and once this begins and doctors understand and know more about it, this is going to be great.”

 

“Incidentally, we developed a book for doctors which was launched three to four months ago and this could be the first way in which to get doctors more involved and interested, because we have now in Jamaica trained over 160 doctors about cannabis and how to prescribe.”

 

“In fact as many doctors as pharmacies have got the products, which they are now using but it’s because of information and education. Our first thrust into the Caribbean is going to be in Guyana and we would love if concurrently or just about the same time we could help in The Bahamas. Because it’s all part of our culture and history for us, and having legality, we should be working together to make this thing legal and useful and explore the opportunities and benefits which are there.”

 

AR-T: “Do you think the FDA approval -while it’s not a regional body- but because they’re such a globally-respected body do you think that’s finally giving your institute in Jamaica the validation that you need to firmly cement yourself as a key player in this industry?”

 

DR LOWE: “Yes I would say so but,  just to clarify GW Pharmaceuticals is the one that has the epilepsy drug approved by the FDA, but we have brought it orphan drugs which we isolated from the cannabis plant and the FDA gave it a designation of an orphan drug, and I don’t know if you know what an orphan drug is.”

 

AR-T: “It means that they have given you initial approval or have flagged that the drug shows promise or that they believe that it is effective?”

 

DR LOWE: “And we’re now working on completing the chemical studies for it to go to market within another two years. But the orphan drug status is very important because we are the first developing country ever to have had this designation by the FDA and we have isolated another drug from the cannabis plant which we’re looking forward to have designated also for pancreatic cancer.”

 

“So we’re doing it at two levels. Our work and development for cosmeceuticals which is mainly external use of the skin and so on, nutraceuticals which you can take internally, and then the critical thing for the FDA, the critical standard which is single molecule which shows the ID and how it can be used for these purposes.”

 

AR-T: “Holding on that point, why is it so important for the Caribbean to have a stake in this industry and plant based medicine in general? You mentioned that this is our culture and our history but can you expand on that and why the urgency to get out now as opposed to waiting for the rest of the world to say that it’s okay to start investigating?”

 

DR LOWE: “You’ve asked a very great question. The answer to that is if other people are seeing the virtues and the efficacy and the safety standards, and if we wait for the world to catch up to us, they’re not only going to catch up but surpass us. And then we turn around to purchase from them, because that’s really what’s going on now.”

 

“I can guarantee you in another year or two we will all be importing cannabis-based products from the United States and Europe just like we do pharmaceutical drugs. So the time is now and we don’t have a lot of time and we have to move on this right away.”

 

AR-T: “I’m not sure where you stand politically but I believe that the personal is always political. Do you see this as a way of accessing reparations or some form of reparative justice for persons in the diaspora?

 

DR LOWE: “ I don’t know if I could say that because reparations is a different matter and nobody is coming to give you any handouts. You better develop what you want, how you can, moving forward in a competitive way.”

 

AR-T: “The biggest key - from what I understand - was the fact that early on in your research you had political leaders or officials who could see or understand your vision and allowed you to carry forward within the legal framework.”

 

“That’s something that we don’t necessarily see in other Caribbean states, in the Bahamas we’re only just now becoming more open to discussing it on the national stage.”

 

DR LOWE: “Correct, and this is why it’s so important to get the political leaders on board. We did this early because while our government and the political leaders at the time couldn't come out publicly and endorse in the early stages, they have done it now. When we launched Medicanja, which is our flagship company for cannabis, we got on board the former Governor general, the former prime ministers from previous government and the sitting government and they became our leaders and literally gave endorsement - so that helped us to move very quickly.”

 

“But it’s all about education and understanding. Education is a continuum and let this be the start.”

 

AR-T: “Agreed. I’m definitely passionate about this and about increasing awareness and easing the stigma around it so that we can have these discussions. I have seen a dramatic relaxing in stigma I don’t know if that’s been your experience too within the last year.”

 

DR LOWE: “Oh it has been but the stigma has not gone away. Right now we know, for example, that most of the what you call VIPS in Jamaica, big businesses and others are involved their own way but they’re not saying it publicly because there’s still this issue and it’s the US approach again.”

 

“We have no banking, and without banking you can hardly say you have a business so you have got to find creative ways of doing your trading and your business. So this is part of it, it’s a built in control and at the same time there's a formal side to it with the banking industry and until those are shifted…you know Canada has gone a big way because they have found a way to do it, Europe has gone a big way and you heard from England and the rest of Europe. Australia has gone very big on this and they have found a way to do it, but the Caribbean is still lagging behind and this is why we have all moved away from sugar and bananas which was the staple up to about 20 years ago.”

 

“We have basically moved out of it. What is our new space? We don’t have it and we’ve got to create it but let us take even hemp, which goes beyond cannabis, or the next stage called marijuana. When you go beyond that, hemp can create more jobs than anything else.”

 

“I think with The Bahamas having so much land there in these little islands you could grow and you would not be able to find enough people to build out the hemp industry and this is something you need to be aware of.”

 

AR-T: It’s just a matter of bringing it to the national fore and having a national discussion about it and also not allowing it to be shelved because it’s so controversial.

 

DR LOWE: “Well you know, you’re going to be objective and brave when you want to do anything new especially when bigger forces want to keep you out of it. You’re talking about health care products and once you can identify the tag line, then you must educate - what then is the problem because you can identify the safety and effectiveness. It’s like aspirin or anything else or even better, and by the way aspirin came from the plant.”

 

“So you know we have to pitch our information in a very strong positive and effective way so that people can see there’s nothing to be afraid of. But our politicians are afraid, and for what reason I don’t know, except that the persons I know are afraid they might lose their visa if they as politicians but  I don't think that they will. Once they’re doing something that is honest and above board and straightforward, the world is going that way.”

Slide6.JPG
Anchor 5
Anchor 6

 

 

 

 

May you always remember...

by Rheena Riley

Rheena Riley is Tobago born, from the Twin Island Republic of Trinidad and Tobago. She is currently a Management Consultant specialized in public sector management. Her passion and academic interest is in international development, public policy and public sector reform. Undertaking social good, and positively contributing to the development of vulnerable members of society is at the heart of her ambition.

Summary

This piece is a call for us to know, believe and always remember that despite a history of suffering and pain, that we are rising, we are greatness, and we are more than conquerors. The aim of this poem is to elicit and instill a sense of immoveable pride; stimulate an ethos of personal courage and inspire resolution to change the way we see ourselves- which is not lesser than any other being; but created with boundless talents; and truly Kings and Queens in our own right.

May You Always Remember,

That You Are the Dream and the Hope of the slave.

God is the source of all our victories, breakthroughs, wisdom and strategies;

From suffering and pain we birthed these, and triumph, resolute and brave.

We rise like a phoenix out of the Ashes. Unchained from the shackles of slavery.

May You Always Remember,

That you are Never Alone.

You come with the perseverance, wit, genius, fortitude and resilience of your Ancestors.

You are divinely defended, armoured and fortified with unwavering strength.

May You Always Remember,

That we are the beginning,

Royalty is streaming through our veins.

We prepared the table, and we sit therein.

Uninvited- they stole, raped and took...

But we still Create. We still Possess the fullness thereof.

 

May You Always Remember,

To thank those that came before us.

To create a path, a legacy, for the ones to come.

For we Are and we beget Seeds of Greatness; vast and immeasurable.

It is evident in all spheres of life; sport, all forms of Art;

 

You are the Fruit which bears Life’s Treasure.

You are the dream of Martin Luther King Jr.

You are the chosen. With God, You Can Do All Things.

You are girded with Truth; and Rising.

Slide6.JPG
Slide6.JPG

 

 

 

 

 

 

The 'Slave Diet' and Generational Disease

By Indira Martin

Indira Martin is a biomedical scientist based in Nassau, Bahamas

Summary

Africans in the diaspora are at significantly higher risk of metabolic disease than either other ethnicities, or even than their genetic relatives in West Africa. The major difference between continental and diasporic Africans was the experience of the Ma'afa, during which they were subjected to the 'slave diet', which many lines of evidence suggest was qualitatively insufficient. Studies of famine and malnutrition in various locations, and throughout recent history, show that a foetus exposed to famine or malnutrition in utero (in the womb), has an increased risk of metabolic disease as an adult. Metabolic diseases include obesity, diabetes and hypertension. Moreover, this effect can persist to the next generation, with even the grandchildren of nutritionally deficient pregnant women having increased risk of disease. Mounting evidence suggests that this inter-generational effect  is caused by an epigenetic mechanism. This video outlines the evidence for an inter-generational effect of a nutritionally deficient 'slave diet' during the Ma'afa, as an underlying predicate for the modern day epidemic of metabolic disease in diasporic Africans.

 

Anchor 7
Anchor 8

 

 

 

 

 

 

Race Relations in the Post-Independence Bahamas

by Christopher Curry

Christopher Curry is currently Associate Professor of History at the University of The Bahamas. His research interests include: Bahamian and Caribbean history, particularly the colonial period; race relations in the colonial and independence eras; and identity formation as it relates to the construction of nationalist narratives.

Summary

This paper challenges the neo-liberal myth of a post-racial Bahamian society. It argues that in the post-independence period (1973-present), race issues remain central to Bahamian identity; manifested in the areas of political discourse, the shaping of community values, the persistence of residential segregation, and even in the social construction of Bahamian nationalism. Traditional archival sources are augmented by an empirical based quantitative survey of Family Island and New Providence communities. The findings suggest that in the post-independence Bahamas, race remains a contentious and divisive issue.

As The Bahamas prepares to celebrate its 45th anniversary of independence a reflection on national identity and the forces that shape it seems necessary. Identity is based on group solidarity, a sense that certain people belong naturally together, and share a common history and culture, which sets them apart from others [1]. In this context, the concept of ‘race’ has always been a vital component in the shaping of Bahamian history and national identity [2]. Yet while Bahamians commonly use ‘race’ in vernacular discourse, the term is problematic for several reasons. As Virginia Cyrus has argued the term ‘race’ has been socially constructed in order to subordinate those without power and consequently reflect social attitudes rather than genetic composition. A further problem that arises is that the term ‘race’ is far too general when categorizing people with very distinct language, culture and community beliefs nor does it take into account the extensive intermixing that has occurred between various groups of people [3]. John Hope Franklin has suggested that ethnicity in its broadest definition extends to language, customs, religion and national origin where race is a narrow and counterproductive concept [4]. Nevertheless, the term is still relevant in The Bahamas where race and class were socially constructed by a small agro-commercial oligarchy who dominated and controlled both the colored middle class and the laboring black masses. For this reason, although the term is archaic, its continued use reflects how deeply embedded race is in the Bahamian ethos and therefore deserving of deeper analysis.  

 

[1]Evelyn McCollin, Resistance and Afro-Caribbean Influences in the development of Bahamian National Identity, presented at Bahamas Historical Society, May 30th2002, p. 1.

[2]Nicolette Bethel, “Navigations: National Identity and the Archipelago,” Yinna, 1(2000), p. 23.

[3]Virginia Cyrus, Experiencing Race, Class and Gender in the United States, (Mountain View California, 2000), p. 11.

[4]John Hope Franklin, “Ethnicity in American Life: The Historical Perspective”, in Experiencing Race Class and Gender in the United States, ed. Virginia Cyrus (Mountain View California, 2000), p. 19. 

Unfortunately, in The Bahamas very little has been written directly concerning racism since independence. The dearth of literature perhaps reflects the waning importance of the issue and the focus of writers on the pre-independence era. Of value however is Colin Hughes’ Race and Politicsthat explores the underlining theme of racial conflict, embedded in the rhetoric of political propaganda [5]. Likewise, Gail Saunders and Michael Craton, in their seminal work Islanders in the Stream, Vol. II, provide insight into current race relations from a community and social perspective [6]. Worth noting is the article by Howard Johnson exploring the construction of an African-Bahamian identity after independence and Michael Craton’s discussion on the role and status of the ‘Conky Joe’ white Bahamian as a non political entity since 1967 [7]. 

Historically, The Bahamas presents a unique model of race relations incorporating elements of both the West Indian and Southern United States systems. The West Indian model, institutionalized during slavery, created a tripartite system with a distinct middle class comprised of coloreds who operated as a buffer between the elite white class and the laboring black masses. The colored middle classes, although the progenitors of white and black sexual liaisons, were rejected by whites due to their color while envied by the enslaved because of their freedom [8]. In The Bahamas, evidence of the tripartite racial model was seen in all aspects of the colonies social, economic and political spheres.

[5]Hughes’ work is also valuable because it extends into the post independence era and provides a race and class analysis model. Colin A Hughes, Race and Politics in The Bahamas, (London, 1981) pp. 21-22. 

[6]Craton and Saunders provide an excellent case study of Spanish Wells. Michael Craton and Gail Saunders, Islanders in the Stream: A History of The Bahamian People,Vol. II, (Athens Georgia, 1998), p. 457.

[7]Howard Johnson, “National Identity and Bahamian Culture,” Yinna, I (2000), pp. 13-20. See also Michael Craton, “Bay Street, Black Power and the Conchy Joes: Race and Class in the Colony and Commonwealth of the Bahamas, 1850-2000”, in The White Minority in the Caribbean, Eds. Howard Johnson and Karl Watson, (Kingston, 1998) pp. 71-94.

[8]Arnold A. Sio “Marginality and Free Colored Identity in Caribbean Society,” Slavery and Abolition, 8, no. 2 (1987), p. 150.

Hence, in recreational and social activities, coloreds in The Bahamas emulated the white minority in order to distance themselves from the black masses and gain respectability or even acceptance by whites [9]. 

At the beginning of the twentieth century, profits made from the burgeoning Tourism industry not only exacerbated the existing racial lines but also introduced a stricter more rigidly defined model of race similar to the Jim Crow South of the United States. As Nicolette Bethel has argued the typical West Indian race class pyramid must be adjusted in The Bahamas where the colored class although recognized as a social or aesthetic group, were ambiguously categorized with the black masses as non-whites by the ruling minority and thus lost their distinctive class identity [10]. Consequently, Nassau was segregated almost entirely with color lines separating housing, education, occupation and even social intercourse. Even the mail boat Dart had sections for whites only, prohibiting non-whites from entering the cabins [11]. According to Gail Saunders coloreds and blacks that had benefited from prohibition were pushed off Bay Street, and forced to establish stores in the Over the Hill areas [12]. Even death could not prevent segregation since blacks and coloreds had to be buried in separate graveyards. Such racial practices in Nassau led a Methodist minister in the 1930s to exclaim: “in no other part of the West Indies is the color situation so sad and the racial bitterness so deep as in the Bahamas.”[13].

[9]Although coloreds rejected certain elements associated with blacks including despising manual labor, agricultural or plantation work they did not abandon completely their African heritage. Gail Saunders, The Role of the Colored Middle Class in Nassau, Bahamas, 1890-1942, Conference of Caribbean Historians: Race Relations in the Caribbean in the 19thand 20thCenturies, April 20-26, 1983, p. 1.

[10]Nicolette Bethel, “Navigations: National Identity and the Archipelago,”Yinna, 1 (2000), p. 25.

[11]Gail Saunders, Bahamian Society after Emancipation, (Kingston, 1994), p. 66.

[12]Gail Saunders “The Changing Face of Nassau: The Impact of Tourism on Bahamian Society in the 1920s and 1930s,” New West Indian Guide71, no. 1-2 (1997), p. 33.

Even after the 1956 anti-discriminatory resolution and the achievement of majority rule in 1967, racial discrimination persisted. Although there were few race related incidents after the resolution, tensions remained and continued as the Progressive Liberal Party gained in popularity among the masses and racial polarization resulted in the hardening of social divisions [14]. Obviously then, there is much value in exploring the extent to which the concept of race and racism has shaped Bahamian identity since independence. In this light, an exploration of racist attitudes and rhetoric in the development of a political culture, the shaping of community values and the formation of a national or distinct community identity will be discussed. Ultimately, the study of race not only provides us with an awareness of the historical antecedents of our national identity, but also provides the framework for addressing issues that may continue to divide our nation.

 

Race and national identity were inextricably connected in the post independence era. This was no more evident than in the early 1970s where the PLP were preoccupied with promoting and developing African dimensions in the nation’s past. In this respect, the PLP developed a plan for national self- identity incorporating a sense of place, a sense of history, and a heightened awareness of the African origins of the nation’s black people.  In the development of national consciousness, the most important aspect was the racial identity that the nation increasingly assumed. The emphasis placed on a black racial identity was a rejection of the white counter identity and the recently ended period of minority rule. Instilling a black national identity was also a reaction against the marginalization of Black Bahamians in history texts or the Euro centric representations of African civilization and Afro-Bahamians in those books where they were discussed [15].

[13]Ibid., p. 34.

[14]Dr. Gail Saunders, “The Impact of Tourism on Bahamian Society and Culture: An Historical Perspective,” Yinna1 (2000), p 80.

The PLP’s new orientation was influenced both by the black political movement in The Bahamas and the Black Power movement in the U.S. For example, the first exhibition mounted by the Department of Archives in February 1973 was entitled ‘Aspects of Slavery’. At the opening the Honorable Livingston Coakley, Minister of Education and Culture remarked that “the survival despite hardships and extreme difficulties by Bahamian forebears as a practical illustration for present citizens on the eve of nationhood.”[16]. Coakley’s emphasis on the shared historical experience of Bahamians of African ancestry provided a sense of national consciousness and unity. Indeed, Howard Johnson has noted that blackness and African-derived cultural expressions were essential to developing a sense of nationality, Bahamian identity and a popular understanding of Bahamian history [17]. Lisle Alleyne writing in the Nassau Guardian clearly demonstrated this connection when she succinctly wrote: 

 

Our Bahamian identity is a unique identity because it is based on our African experiences and our Bahamian experiences. I know the colored people are saying that they have never been to Africa to have such an experience, but these are the experiences of our forefathers that produced: Junkanoo, Goombay etc. These are the experiences that make up our identity and culture; these are the experiences that make Bahamians unique [18].

 

Interestingly, the writer equates the term ‘colored’ with blacks, reflecting a shift from the original meaning of the word that was historically associated with the mulattoes or mixed class. This popular view reflected the widespread belief immediately following independence and supported by PLP stalwarts that a true Bahamian was phenotypically identified as black. Indeed, the popularity of the PLP was related to their efforts to promote black consciousness and race pride among the majority. 

[13]Ibid., p. 34.

[14]Dr. Gail Saunders, “The Impact of Tourism on Bahamian Society and Culture: An Historical Perspective,” Yinna1 (2000), p 80.

[15]Howard Johnson, “National Identity and Bahamian Culture,” Yinna, 1 (2000), pp. 13-15.

[16]Nassau Guardian, February 13th1973 cited by Howard Johnson “National Identity and Bahamian Culture,” Yinna,1 (2000), p. 14. 

[17]Ibid., p. 16. 

[18]Lisle Alleyne, Jr. who wrote from Pace College in New York City Nassau Guardian 1 March 1973, cited in Howard Johnson, “National Identity and Bahamian Culture,” Yinna, 1 (2000), p. 15. 

Economic empowerment for the black masses was also espoused by the PLP. This was evident in the campaign leading up to the 1977 general election. One party supporter glowingly endorsed the efforts of the PLP when he remarked:

Before 1967 what colored man had had a nice big house? If you had found two you would not have found three. All they had was huts. Or where could you have found colored people working in the banks? Where could you have found electricity on every street or almost every house? [19]

.

Although the PLP certainly made some progressive changes, the economic disparity between the whites and blacks remained entrenched after independence. Local whites retained their economic hegemony by simply maintaining family traditions, training their children towards the professions and mercantile jobs, and reforming their hiring practices. Indeed, the white Bay Streeters who had lost their political power with Majority Rule and independence, continued to flourish, being labeled the White Knights by one political columnist [20].

 

Yet Brent Symonette, the white MP for Montagu, in an interview on March 21st 2003 claimed that the idea of Bay Street being controlled by a small group of white merchants was a myth perpetuated by the political powers of the day. He mentioned that black merchants had become extremely successful in making inroads on Bay Street including Tiger Finlayson and Mats Gibson [21].

While Symonette provided examples of a few successful black entrepreneurs on Bay Street, the continued presence of a cabal of white controlled property owners persisted. According to Michael Craton, observers noted that most of the businesses on central Bay Street continued to be white-owned throughout the 1990s and that whites carefully maintained nearly all the freeholds of the few premises leased to blacks [22]. 

 

Although Bay Street continued to be dominated by the white minority, coloreds and blacks made inroads in other areas. Indeed, in Family Island communities, non-whites particularly benefited from the change in government in 1992. This was true in the case of the ‘Long Island Whites’ who were more or less marginalized during the PLP’s tenure and who actually enjoyed a period of unprecedented economic prosperity [23].  In New Providence, professionally trained and educated blacks were able to achieve upward mobility, many moving out of the Over the Hill areas to more lavish housing in newly developed subdivisions in the southeast and western ends of the island. 

 

Yet, in The Bahamas, the black, white and colored classes remained divided along racial lines. Most whites continued to live either on the ridges on the eastern or western end of New Providence or on the isolated offshore cays of Abaco and Eleuthera. In New Providence apart from the white population confined to a thin line of housing on the North shore, there was a growing pocket in Centerville on the eastern edge of the old city of Nassau.[24]Moreover, while some black and colored professionals became upwardly mobile, the disparity between the rich and the poor seemed unevenly balanced towards white Bahamians who both in New Providence and the Family Islands enjoyed renewed economic strength, investing in land and lavish housing in their ‘preferred location.’   

 

 

[22]Michael Craton and Gail Saunders, Islanders in the Stream,Vol. II, (Athens, Georgia, 1998), p. 440.

[23]Craton, “Bay Street and Black Power”, in The White Minority in the Caribbean, p. 86.[24]Colin A Hughes, Race and Politics in The Bahamas, (London: 1981), p. 25.

  

In addition to class divisions, politics in The Bahamas continued to reflect a preoccupation with race in the post independence era. Arguably, in no other area has the issue of race held such a dominant position than in Bahamian politics. One of the reasons why race and politics were so intricately connected was because Pindling and the PLP government used the race card in their speeches and campaigning to rally the support of the masses. On more than one occasion Pindling aired the epic African-American movie Roots before elections. In the 1977 election campaign, for example, one placard at a BDP rally exclaimed ‘Food not Roots Mr. PM,’ in obvious reference to the programming intended for ZNS [25]. Opposing candidates often were aware of Pindling’s attempt to divert the issue away from pressing economic and political concerns by showing Roots. Janet Bostwick, at the time a young political aspirant and candidate for the Pinedale constituency in 1977, charged the PLP with showing Roots “simply to stir up racial hatred in this general election campaign.”[26]. As a parting shot at Pindling, Bostwick argued that it was “hypocritical for the PM to show Roots or segments of it at PLP meetings in New Providence but when the PM was in Abaco he would be seen hugging Caucasian candidate Edison Key.” [27]. In the end, her criticism of the PLP suggested that the airing of Roots was simply a political ploy to gain votes from the majority. Even in the 1992 election campaign the Nassau Guardianas early as April had predicted that: “the PLP would get out that old racial horse and flog it into full sprint towards election day.” [28]. Although Radio ZNS did not repeat the cliché of rerunning Roots as part of its campaign, it did broadcast’ racially inflammatory programs accusing the FNM of being the Old UBP in disguise [29].

[25]Nassau GuardianJuly 6th1977 (Monty Ritchie, Channel 10 to televise BDP rally).

[26]Nassau Guardian July 13, 1977 (Clunis Devaney, Roots telecast designed ‘to stir up racial hatred’).

[27]Nassau Guardian July 13, 1977.

[28]Michael Craton and Gail Saunders, Islanders in the StreamVol. II, p. 386.

[29]Ibid.,  p. 386.

Pindling’s opponents often charged that his use of racial propaganda was as bad or worse than his colonial predecessors. Dr. John MacCartney, leader of the left-wing Vanguard Party argued that the PLP practiced a form of neo-colonialism by simply replicating the practices of the white minority. As such the PLP were able to remain in power until 1992 by continuing to victimize and ostracize Bahamians who spoke out against its policies while ignoring deteriorating economic conditions through the skillful use of the race card. McCartney further stated that the blatant appeal to race resonated with the Black masses, who did not see a trustworthy non-racist alternative to the PLP [30]. Further criticism of the PLP came from the more conservative voice of Arthur Foulkes in a speech aired on ZNS radio in 1977, the BDP candidate for Delaporte implored Bahamians: 

Not to be deceived by the PLP with there tired old racist propaganda. It is time that we in the Bahamas grow up to the facts of life and that is that we have to live together and work together as Bahamians if we are to achieve true peace and tranquility within our shores. Racism does not belong to a civilized and Godly society. A society cannot fulfill its full potential for social and cultural development as long as it is plagued with racism [31].

 

Many FNM and BDP party supporters echoed similar sentiments about the race issue. In the July 12th 1977 edition of the Nassau Guardian, E.L. Halcon addressed the race issue by suggesting that the PLP believed they could win black votes by simply stating that they are a black party [32]. He further suggested that many Bahamians had become intimidated and manipulated by the PLP’s claim that a vote for a certain party would be giving the country back to the white man [33]. Like Foulkes, Halcon appealed to Bahamians to leave color out of the

 

[30]John T McCartney, “The Influences of the Black Panther Party (USA) on the Vanguard Party of the Bahamas 1972-1987,” New Political Science, 21, no. 2 (1999), p. 209.

[31]Nassau GuardianFriday July 15th1977 (Foulkes warns nation not to be deceived by racist propaganda).

[32]Nassau Guardian July 12th1977 (E.L. Halcon, to the Editor).

[33]Nassau Guardian, July 12th1977.

 

campaigns, suggesting he would “far prefer an honest white man than a dishonest black man.” [34]. Another writer, N. Hepburne specifically criticized Pindling for using every trick in the book including reverting to stirring up hate towards white people to win the election [35].  Hepburne ended his letter by reminding readers not to get caught up in the race issue orchestrated by the PLP “and allow these past experiences to prevent us from voting with our heads. Who are we going to hurt? Not the white man, and the dead slaves.”[36]. Another writer called Scorpio made the most succinct and critical appraisal of the PLP’s use of race in election campaigning when he remarked that: 

Whether or not there is any historical basis for the claim of the black majority being subjected to 300 years of slavery by the white minority it has little if any relevance to the present realities of life and it should not be used as an excuse for reversed racism. The fact is the only kind of slavery Bahamians have known in recent times is that resulting from the PLP leadership [37].

 

Evidently, Scorpio felt the PLP’s use of race served only to inflame the fire of racism towards the politically marginalized white minority.   

     

In contrast, PLP supporters claimed that white merchants were secretly funding the opposition parties and feared The Bahamas would return to white minority rule if the government lost the election. In a letter in the July 19thedition of the Nassau Guardian, L.D. Taxpayer reminded his readers “for the past 10 years (since the PLP took over) I have been free, so why should I go back under the white law again? Not because we are colored people, should we go back to slavery again.”[38].

[34]Nassau Guardian, July 12th1977            

[35]Nassau GuardianFriday July 15th1977 (N. Hepburne, to the Editor).

[36]Nassau GuardianFriday July 15th1977.

[37]Nassau Guardian July 16th, 1977 (El Scorpio, letter to the Editor).

[38]Nassau Guardian July 19th, 1977 (L.D. Taxpayer to the Editor).

 

Fear of a return to white minority rule was also evident in the writing of Dudley Capron when he argued; “We must not let the white man invade our minds with his teachings for he is the enemy of freedom for the black man. Instill black pride in your hearts, glorify in your blackness.”[39]. Clearly in 1977, the issue of race was not only tied to the popular support of the masses but integral to an understanding of national identity. 

 

More recent debate has demonstrated that race remains a central part of political discourse in The Bahamas. In November 2002, the chairman of the PLP, Raynard Rigby admitted that the PLP needed to focus on winning the support of the white Bahamian in order to achieve victory in the 2007 general elections. Rigby, speaking on Island FM’s Parliament Street, further argued that the PLP needed to reach across the brow and invite white Bahamians into the PLP. Rigby confessed that although whites amounted to 15% of the Bahamian population he was not certain that the PLP had the support of even 1% [40]. In order to bring more whites into the PLP in mass, Rigby believed that talks about the non-acceptance of whites by the PLP needs to be abolished sooner than later [41]. Although Rigby’s comments appeared conciliatory, the FNM chairman Dwight Sawyer was extremely critical of his statements. In the Nassau Tribunedated December 6th, 2002, Sawyer claimed that the PLP chairman “insulted white Bahamians by suggesting that they be invited to join en masse in order to ensure the PLP remain the government.” [42] .Sawyer further suggested that the PLP continues to view the white minority as merely political assets. As such, while the PLP would like to be identified as a new pluralistic multiracial party, it has not done enough to establish credibility with white Bahamians. According to Sawyer, the credibility of the PLP was damaged by Rigby’s comments

[39]The Tribune June 4th1977 (Dudley Capron to the Editor).

[40]The TribuneNovember 25th2002 (Daniel Stubbs, Rigby: P.L.P. need white support).

[41]The TribuneNovember 25th2002.

[42]Nassau Tribune, Friday December 6th, 2002 (FNM: Rigby insulted white Bahamians).

because they reflected the old racial bigotry of the Pindling era that alienated white Bahamians for decades [43]. As an adept political propagandist himself, Sawyer was then able to shift the focus onto his party, suggesting that the FNM represented a truly pluralistic multiracial party claiming that:

From 1992-2002 FNM put effort into building bridges of friendship, unity and peaceful existence among races and classes in the community, so that today the country is among the most homogenous and racially harmonious in the region. Under FNM watch we effected the annual One Bahamas celebration which each year reaffirms that commitment to peace and unity and today Bahamians growing up with greater sense of fair play and shared heritage [44].

 

Although Sawyer accurately assessed some of the initiatives established by the FNM government, he was overly optimistic about current race relations in The Bahamas and the role his party played in creating such a ‘harmonious environment’. 

Recent issues surrounding Brent Symonette’s plans for challenging the leadership of the party have brought race to the forefront of the FNM party and the nation as a whole. When interviewed, Brent Symonette argued that during his public campaign throughout The Bahamas he had received overwhelming support in his efforts to challenge for the party leadership. Nevertheless, he acknowledged that he was not campaigning in the heat of an election campaign where racism could be whipped up against him. Yet even here, Symonette confidently added that the question of race was not one of the reasons that would cause him to withdraw his candidacy [45]. 

Other politicians supported Symonette’s candidacy. Algernon Allen in an interview with the Tribune, on April 2nd, endorsed the idea of a white party leader when he remarked that “the fact that his father was ex-premier Sir Roland Symonette- who led the old UBP government in the 1960s should no longer be a consideration.” [46].

[43]The Tribune, Friday December 6th, 2002.

[44]The Tribune, Friday December 6th, 2002.

[45]Interview with Brent Symonette, March 21st2003.

[46]The TribuneApril 3rd, 2003 (We Should be mature enough to accept Symonette as contender). 

According to Allen, some Bahamians fear that if Brent were leader of the party it would result in a return to slavery. However, Allen dismissed this notion by arguing that the concept of Bay Street controlled by a white mercantile elite is “likened to an old derelict vehicle left on the side of the road years ago. There is no such thing as a mercantile grouping dominating this nation. To preach that is demagoguery.” [47]. Expressing similar sentiments, Bernard Nottage leader of the CDR, suggested in a radio interview that a white Bahamian could once again lead a political party but only after the last stigmata of race is removed from Bahamian society where whites are included in all national expressions and not apart from them [48]. In a poll conducted by the Tribune, out of 370 persons participating, 66% believed The Bahamas was ready for a political party to have a white leader. Of the 250 ‘yes’ voters many felt that The Bahamas has moved beyond the race issue. Many suggested that if the leader is qualified and listens to the masses then it was acceptable [49]. In the Tribune editorial of April 16th, the editor strongly supported the idea of a white leader, remarking that “the time has come when any Bahamian of ability, vision and devotion to his country can become prime minister-regardless of color.”[50].        

Despite these endorsements, many people had reservations about Symonette and the possibility of a white party leader.  In the Tribunepoll, those that voted no believed that since the country is comprised mainly of blacks there ought to be a black leader. Others cited the pervasive insecurity and distrust of whites as a reason why a white party leader was not acceptable [51].  Nikki Kelly in the Bahamas Journalnoted that because of his color and political antecedents, Mr. Symonette should abandon the idea of aspiring to the leadership of his party. Kelly concluded that it would take another fifty years before the black majority accepts a white man whose family was associated with white minority rule in a leadership position [52].  It is evident that while the racial rhetoric of the Pindling era has subsided, the historical antecedents of race and politics still influence Bahamians today particularly where leadership issues arise [53].

[47]The TribuneApril 3rd, 2003.

[48]The Tribune,January 13th2003, (Dominic Duncombe, Nottage- A White man can be PM-CDR leader: The Bahamas must move beyond these issues).

[49]The TribuneApril 14th2003 (Callers say Bahamas is ready for a white leader of a political party).

[50]The TribuneApril 16th, 2003 (The Bahamas is ready for a white leader). 

[51]The Tribune, April 14th, 2003. 

A survey conducted in February 2003, suggests that race remains a powerful and at times divisive issue in Bahamian society as a whole. The survey represented a stratified modified model in that it targeted specific Family Island and New Providence communities with varied racial components. As such, the all white Family island communities of Spanish Wells and Hope Town as well as the black community of Bain Town in New Providence were targeted. Additionally, biracial bifurcated communities of Rock Sound, Marsh Harbor and Harbor Island were surveyed. The choice of Abaco, Eleuthera and their adjoining offshore cays was based on the demographic patterns of these islands, where the largest number of whites outside of New Providence settled and residential segregation had been practiced for well over two hundred years. For each community targeted, individuals residing within the settlement conducted a survey of twenty respondents. Of the total respondents, sixty-five percent were female to thirty-five percent male, ranging in age from 13 to 74. 77% of the respondents identified themselves as black while only 23% identified themselves as white [54]. Of note, 91% of the respondents were Bahamian with the remainder being 6% Haitian and 3% American. Of the 91% Bahamian respondents, 45% were born in New Providence, with Abaco a distant second at 26.3% and Eleuthera and Harbor Island at 13.7% and 12.6% respectively. 

[52]Bahama Journal  (S. Wilson to Editor).

[53]The TribuneApril 14th2003 (Does Color matter in race for FNM leader?).

[54]This was slightly higher than the last official census that recorded 15% white to 85% black. The censuses of 1943 and 1953 were the only ones after 1851 designating the Bahamian population by race. After 1953 racial categories were not given in The Bahamas census both because of the difficulties in tabulation and of heightened racial sensitivities. After 1953, therefore, while a fair calculation of the number of expatriate whites can be given from the statistics of national origin, that of native Bahamian whites or persons of mixed race cannot.See Michael Craton, “Bay Street, Black Power and the Conchy Joes”, p. 92.

The level of social interaction determined the response to many of the questions in the survey. For example, 92% of all respondents felt comfortable around people of another race yet only 79% acknowledged that they had friends of another race. Business and work-related interaction were evident where 84.7% did business with persons of another race, 88.8% would employ a person of another race and 68% worked or went to classes with persons of another race. Interaction declined with involvement in recreational or sporting activities where only 51% of respondents participated with people of another race. Again, when considering playing sports or engaging in recreational activities with another race 40% of respondents would, while on the other hand 42% replied with a maybe. Additionally, declining interaction outside of formal business and work areas was evident where only 54.5% of respondents would date someone of another race. The persistence of residential segregation was also evident in that only 58% of respondents lived in a residential area with persons of another race and only 50% of persons living in an all white or all black community would consider living in a mixed residential area. In general terms, the persistence of racism in the various communities was evident where 64.6% of respondents agreed that there was racism in their community and 62.2% had experienced personally some form of racism. 

The opinionated questions also verified the persistence of racism in The Bahamas. As to whether racism is a problem in The Bahamas today, 42% strongly agreed, 36% agreed while on the other hand only 14% of respondents disagreed and 8% strongly disagreed. Perhaps more telling was the question of racial harmony in the community. Only 33% strongly agreed that there was racial harmony in their community. Respondent’s concern over the issue of racism was reflected by 73.7% who strongly agreed that racial harmony was a critical issue in The Bahamas today while only 14% disagreed and 1% strongly disagreed. Interestingly, only 21% of respondents strongly agreed that racism was a problem for them whereas 29% disagreed and 38% strongly disagreed.     

                        

In general, the survey results suggest that interaction between individuals of different races takes place but that less formal, social or intimate relations are still unacceptable for most Bahamians surveyed. In essence, while Bahamians were willing to do business and employ persons of another race, dating, playing sports or other recreational activities were less appealing. Social distancing theory helps explain why individuals within a particular racial group distance themselves from others. According to Muzafer Sherif, interaction between different groups in a competitive environment often led to hostile derogatory name calling, stereotyping and unfavorable attitudes towards others developing [55].

 

[55]Muzafer Sherif, “Super-ordinate Goals in the Reduction of Inter-group Conflict”, in Social Psychology,(Third Edition) ed. Terry F Pettijohn  (Guilford Connecticut, 2001), p. 146.

In Alan Gary LaFlamme’s, study of the bi-racial community on Green Turtle Cay in 1972 he suggested a number of forces that have kept the two ethnic groups apart noting the relative physical isolation, residential segregation, segregated work schedules, recreational segregation and social distance. Within the social distance framework, LaFlamme also noted the preference for socializing within one’s own ethnic group over the other group. As a result, LaFlamme noted that on Green Turtle Cay, differences in culture are maintained or even created and derived from differences in resources, personal association, and shared ideas [56]. Even the Loyalist Memorial Garden erected by the whites in 1983 symbolizes the community’s racial segregation with its central icon a heroic Loyalist woman waving the union flag and a loyal female slave ‘a suitable’ step or two behind [57].

Within all white Family island communities a common thread of residential segregation and racial attitudes remains entrenched [58]. Historically, Spanish Wells was known as the most prejudiced of all the white communities, prohibiting blacks from remaining on the island overnight [59]. Today, except for a handful of government officials (and, anomalously, the black wife of a white Methodist minister), the entire population of the original settlement remains ‘Conchy Joe’ white, the majority are blood relations and more than one quarter rejoice in the single surname Pinder [60]. The dominance of racial attitudes is clearly evident even today from the community’s refusal to complete the survey conducted on racism in The Bahamas [61].

However, its residential segregation policy has shifted in recent years from Bahamian black laborers on the mainland to the growing number of Haitian nationals living as squatters on nearby Russell Island. In 1989 a crisis was reached when twenty-five white children were withdrawn by their parents from the public school on the grounds that they were now outnumbered by Haitian pupils, who were said to be uncleanly, carry infectious diseases, and to speak only kweyole.

 

 

 

[56]Alan Gary LaFlamme, Green Turtle Cay: A Bi-racial Community in the Out Island Bahamas (PhD thesis, State University of New York at Buffalo, 1972), cited in Colin Hughes, Race and Politics, p. 23. 

[57]Craton, “Bay Street, Black Power and the Conchy Joes”, p. 84.

[58]Gail Saunders, Bahamian Society after Emancipation,(Kingston, 1994), p. 61.

[59]Ibid., p. 66.

[60]Michael Craton, “Bay Street, Black Power and Conchy Joes”, p. 87.

[61]Interview with Abner Pinder, Local Government Official for Spanish Wells. March 19th2003. Abner attempted to conduct the survey but admitted he had been frustrated by members of the community who refused to answer the questions, many citing that they had problems with the questions related to dating and sexual relations with persons of another race. 

With assistance from the government, the crisis was resolved in a pragmatic way that allowed the whites to paternalistically boast that they alone knew how to deal with inferiors of another race [62]. Unfortunately, Spanish Wells is not alone in its residential segregation policy. Craton and Saunders note that by the 1980s, each of the Abaco Cays had its small resident group of Haitian migrants, informally assigned a location for their settlement in the remotest spot and in the case of Man-o-War Cay, adjacent to the garbage dump [63].

Although the general trend has shifted towards racially stereotyping Haitians, traditional racist attitudes among Bahamians still predominated in the post independence era.  In a recent letter to the editor of the Nassau Tribune, the author noted that although The Bahamas has been a free black independent nation for thirty years racial problems persist today. She further argued that white lies are still being taught in schools and that the police are still afraid of white people often overlooking their crimes [64]. As a concluding statement the author suggested that both local, and foreign whites ought to “pack your evil attitude in a bag with the rest of your things and leave our beautiful shores. The battle is over and you have lost.”[65]. Equally revealing was the response to this letter by Meghen McCombe O’Brien who suggested that the previous author had brought shame and humiliation to many proud Bahamian people. O’Brien asserted that the writer was a racist and only magnified her own ignorance and hypocritical beliefs towards what truly defines a Bahamian [66]. In a rhetorical tone O’Brien questioned how can a “truly proud Bahamian preach, that racism is okay as long as it is black against white and not vica versa?”[67]. O’Brien herself took the offense when she said: 

You need to go back to school keep your mouth shut and learn that Bahamians built this country not just black Bahamians. Ms. Wells, it is you and people like you black and white that keep racism alive in today’s society and it is you all that should be condemned, not for physical acts of violence, but mental acts of violence as it is you that punish innocent Bahamians and constantly ignite the flame of our tragic history to keep the fire of ignorance alive in today’s society, forever weakening the power of the Bahamian spirit [68].

[62]Craton and Saunders, Islanders in the Stream. Vol. I, pp. 457-458.

[63]Ibid., p. 457.

[64]The TribuneJanuary 21st, 2003 (Ursula Wells to the Editor).

[65]The TribuneJanuary 21st, 2003.

[66]The Tribune January 23rd, 2003 (Meghen McCombe O’Brien, Letter to the Editor).

[67]The Tribune January 23rd, 2003.

[68]The Tribune January 23rd, 2003 

 

While both authors attempted to discuss the issue from an objective point of view, it is clear from the personalized nature of the comments that race remains a powerfully divisive issue in The Bahamas. Tragically Bahamians of different racial backgrounds are still unable to discuss issues of race and themes such as slavery without in the words of Patricia- Glinton Meicholas, growing bitter, ashamed or self- righteous [69].

 

 In the end, race has proven to be a dominant aspect of Bahamian identity reflected in political discourse, community values, the persistence of distinctive class lines and attitudes. In the political arena, the recent debate over the possibility of a white party leader has certainly proven that race remains a powerful tool in political rhetoric and reality. Similarly, based on the survey conducted in various Family Island and New Providence communities it is evident that social distancing is related to the persistence of racial attitudes. Although clearly defined class and race lines have become blurred with the growth of a wealthier more educated black middle class, residential segregation and economic disenfranchisement are still prevalent. In essence, although the introduction of ‘One Bahamas’ celebrations and other unifying initiatives have instilled a level of commonly held customs and values, there are still latent and overt forms of racial tensions that divide Bahamians. Ultimately, as The Bahamas, approaches its fourty-fifth year of independence, the issue of race is still not resolved.    

[69]Patricia Glinton- Meicholas, “Uncovering the Bahamian Self, ” Yinna1 (2000), p. 108.

   

 

Bibliography

 

Bethel, Nicolette. “Navigations: National Identity and the Archipelago”, Yinna, 1 (2000), pp. 21-34.

 

Craton, Michael and Gail Saunders, Islanders in the StreamVol. II, Athens, Georgia: University of Georgia Press, 1998. 

 

Craton, Michael. “Bay Street, Black Power and the Conchy Joes: Race and Class in the Colony and Commonwealth of the Bahamas, 1850-2000”, in Howard Johnson and Karl Watson (eds.) The White Minority in the Caribbean, Kingston: Ian Randle, 1998, pp. 71-94. 

 

Cyrus, Virginia. Ed. Experiencing Race, Class and Gender in the United States, Mountain View California: Mayfield Publishing Company, 2000.

 

Franklin, John Hope. “Ethnicity in American Life: The Historical Perspective”, in Virginia Cyrus (ed). Experiencing Race Class and Gender in the United States,  Mountain View California: Mayfied Publishing Company, 2000, pp. 14-19. 

 

Hughes, Colin A. Race and Politics in The Bahamas, London: University of Queensland Press, 1981.

 

Johnson, Howard. “National Identity and Bahamian Culture”, Yinna, 1: (2000), pp. 13-20.

 

McCartney, John T., “The Influences of the Black Panther Party (USA) on the Vanguard Party of the Bahamas 1972-1987”, New Political Science, 21, no.2, (1999), pp. 205-210. 

 

McCollin, Evelyn. Resistance and Afro-Caribbean Influences in the development of Bahamian National Identity, presented at Bahamas Historical Society, May 30th, 2002.

 

Meicholas, Patricia Glinton. “Uncovering the Bahamian Self”, Yinna, 1 (2000), pp 104-110.

 

Saunders, Gail, Bahamian Society after Emancipation. Kingston, Jamaica: Ian Randle, 1994.

 

Saunders, Gail. The Role of the Colored Middle Class in Nassau, Bahamas, 1890-1942, Conference of Caribbean Historians: Race Relations in the Caribbean in the 19thand 20thcenturies, April 20-26, 1983.

 

Saunders, Gail. “The Changing Face of Nassau: The Impact of Tourism on Bahamian Society in the 1920s and 1930s”, New West Indian Guide71, no. 1-2 (1997), pp. 21-42.

 

Saunders, Gail “The Impact of Tourism on Bahamian Society and Culture: An Historical Perspective”, Yinna1 (2000), pp. 72-87.

 

Sherif, Muzafer. “Super ordinate Goals in the Reduction of Inter-group Conflict”, in Terry F Pettijohn (ed). Social Psychology, (Third Edition), Guilford, Connecticut: McGraw-Hill Dushkin, 2001, pp. 143-149.

 

Sio, Arnold A. “Marginality and Free Colored Identity in Caribbean Society”, Slavery and Abolition8, no. 2 (1987), pp.166-182.                            

Newspapers

Nassau Guardian

Nassau Tribune

Bahamas Journal

Interviews

Abner Pinder March 19th2003

Brent Symonette March 21st2003

Slide6.JPG
Anchor 9
Slide6.JPG

Racism meets Sports and the adverse ramification for the Black Athlete

by Marlon Miller

Marlon Miller is highly motivated individual who has a hunger and thirst for knowledge, enjoys working in groups and is willing to make sacrifices to causes greater than oneself.

Summary

Whether it be overt or covert, institutional or personal, racism is a ubiquitous form of discriminations experienced by African/Black People all over the world in different aspect of their lives. One such area of life is in athletics, an arena in which millions of African people participate.  The acts of racism could range anywhere from the hurling of racial epithets at Black athletes, to the bias media portrayal of Black Athletes. Therefore, this paper seeks to describe and analyzing different forms of racism experienced by Black athletes.

 

Sports are so tightly woven into the fabric of modern society that every country has a recognized national sport. Furthermore, sports have morphed into “pseudoreligions” in many countries, as cricket is in India and football (soccer) is in Brazil. Sports have also been a flag bearer for regional and racial pride, as was the West Indies Crickets team for the former British colonies of the Caribbean.  Racism against African people, like sports, is also tightly woven into the fabric of modern society. Evidence to the former can easily be seen in the disproportionate incarceration rates of African American men in the United States as well as the apparent bias of the International Criminal Court towards Africa. Given the ubiquity of racism and sports in modern society, it is conceivable to believe that both worlds will intersect each other at some point, with adverse effects for Black athletes caught at this juncture. The intersection of racism and sports can be seen in the biased media coverage received by Black athletes, the limited representation/opportunities for Black People off the “field” as well as the racial abuse endured by Black Athletes all over the world.    

The O.J. Simpson trial dominated American public discourse for the better part of ten months. Much of the fervor and interest generated by the trial was exploited by all the major players in the American media landscape. One such media outlet was Time Magazine, who placed O.J. Simpson’s mugshot on the cover of the June 1994 issue of the magazine (Arogundade, 2016). Placing a famous athlete such as O.J. Simpson on the cover of a magazine is nothing unusual, however, what made this situation particularly intriguing is the fact that Time Magazine edited the image by intentionally darkening Simpson’s mugshot.

 

In doing so, Time Magazine reinforced the stereotype of Black Men being sinister criminals. What’s more, this cover was released in 1994 and in 1995, O.J was acquitted of all charges yet, a year prior he was “convicted” by Time Magazine. Even though Time Magazine was unsuccessful in predicting the outcome of the O.J Simpson’s case, they were successful in setting a precedent for other magazines to follow. Four years later, in 1998, Sports Illustrated would follow in the footsteps of Time Magazine in their May 4 publication, which discussed numerous paternity suits against professional athletes (Munson, 1998).  The article was titled “Where’s Daddy?” which had Greg Minor’s two-year-old son holding a basketball on the cover (Childs, 1998). The image of Greg Minor’s son was a prelude as to the ethnicity of the majority of the athletes discussed in Munson’s article. For example, Munson discussed in great detail the paternity suits of Juwan Howard, Shawn Kemp, Gary Payton and Larry Johnson (Munson, 1998). The common thread that binds these men together is their racial identity (African American) and the sport they play. The only paternity suit of a white basketball player that was discussed was that of Larry Bird’s, which was public knowledge long before the article was published (Childs, 1998). The only other non-basketball players discussed were Dave Meggett (Football) and Mike Peluso (Hokey).

The inherent bias within Munson’s article is embedded in the fact that he chose to concentrate the majority of his attention on basketball players (Childs, 1998). By the numbers, Black men are disproportionally represented in the National Basketball Association (NBA), when compared to National Football League (NFL), MLB and National Hockey League (NHL). Therefore, by focusing mainly on basketball players, the probability increases that the majority of the athletes engaged in paternity suits will be black men. If the article had focused on athletes from all four major American sports, the narrative could have been significantly different as the racial focus would be wider. Furthermore, irrespective of racial identity, a large cross section of athletes all over the world engage in promiscuous behavior with the same regularity. Yet Munson’s article perpetuates the narrative of black athletes, particularly men, being consistently engaged in promiscuous behavior and suffering the consequences thereof.

 

Magazines are not the only media outlet that engage in the concoction of racially biased media coverage against black athletes. Other frequent perpetrators include sports analysts and commentators, whose bias stem from the language used in the description of black athletes. Their coded language is used to describe all aspects of the athlete’s functioning, whether it be temperaments, performance or the likelihood of excelling in a specific sport or positions. Firstly, in the case of temperament and performance, Schmidt and Coe (2014) observed that commentators often described Tiger Woods (who is of mixed ethnicity) with descriptions in line with stereotypes of Black athletes, such as experiencing a loss of composure when he was underperforming in competition. This particular stereotype is not limited to golf commentators; similar sentiments were expressed by England’s cricket captain Tony Grieg. Prior to the start of the West Indies 1976 tour of England, Grieg remarked that “sure, they’ve got a couple of fast bowlers, but … you must remember that (if) the West Indian get on top they are magnificent cricketers, but if they’re down, they grovel. And I intend, with the help of Closey and a few others, to make them grovel” (Sengupta, 2014). One does not need to have any knowledge of cricket’s history or be a fan of golf in order to see the striking similarities between Schmidt and Coe’s observations and Grieg’s comments. Both statements hinted at the fact that once black athletes are faced with adversity, their performances dwindle as a result. Moreover, Grieg made those statements in 1976 and Tiger Woods is an athlete of the new millennium. This means that the stereotype of the black athlete losing their composure when faced with adversity has persisted for decades, across multiple sports.

 

In sports (particularly team sports), different physical or mental attributes are important predictors in determining an athlete’s success. For instance, if you are below six feet tall, your chances of making the NBA are slim. Thus, we can conclude that height is an important predictor in determining successful basketball players. Also, if you not able to perform under pressure you will find it hard to succeed in any sport. Given that we know there are specific intangibles necessary for athletic success, it is conceivable to believe that when analysts are talking about athletes, they will use refer to these intangibles. Nevertheless, some commentators have used those intangibles to create negative stereotypes of Black athletes. For instance, when describing black athletes, commentators have a tendency to refer to their physical attributes namely their powerful, athletic and natural abilities. On the other hand, references describing white athletes focus more on their cognitive abilities such as their determination, emotional stability and composition (Schmidt and Coe 2014). In isolation, these comments are harmless, were it not for the sacred place that sports hold in most modern societies.

 

One implication is that white athletes are more likely than black athletes to be praised for their athletic exploits. On the contrary, black athletes are subjects of much harsher criticism for their failures, when compared to their white counterparts (Schmidt and Coe 2014). The reasons for this can directly attributed to the aforementioned stereotypes used to describe black and white athletes. As the old adage goes “whom much is given, much is expected”, therefore, when commentators believe that black people are “natural athletes”, equipped with all the physical attributes necessary to succeed and they underperform, it goes without saying that they will be harshly criticized. On the contrary, white athletes being described as “determined”, implicitly implies that any success they achieve is as a result of hard work and perseverance. Consequently, it is easy to understand why white athletes get more praise than they deserve and black athletes more criticism than necessary.

 

In its formative years, professional sports was reserved for whites only. However, things began to change in the mid to late twentieth century, depending on the sport. The West Indies Cricket got their first black captain in 1963 (Encyclopedia Britannica). English football began to see a rise in the number of black players in the 1970s and 1980s (Cleland & Cashmore, 2014), while American sports were hit by the integration wave in the 1940s, with the likes of Jackie Robinson and Kenny Washington who played baseball and American football respectively (Primm et. al, 2007). Connect it with the previous or following sentence. With the passage of time, the number of black players in the respective sports has risen to the point where one could say the field of play is truly integrated. Yet, the same cannot be said for the coaches’ box, where the number of black coaches are miniscule (Schmidt and Coe 2014). If this were the 1950s or even the early 2000s, this might not be an issue but given the number of black athletes participating at the highest level, it seems inconceivable that the coaches’ box does not mirror their on field representation. Take the NBA, a league that is made up of 75% black players (Mudede, 2017), distributed across thirty teams, only 20% of the coaches are black. The NFL also follows in the footsteps of the NBA where black players make up 65% of the population yet only account for 25% of the head coaching positions (Mudede, 2018). Underrepresentation of black coaches is not just exclusive to American sports, as the narrative follows a similar script in English Football. According to Liew (2018), just 7 per cent of the current Premier League and Football League managers, and 2.6 per cent of all the permanent managers in Premier League history, are BAME. Taking into account that BAME is the abbreviation for Black Asian Minority Ethnicity, it is safe to assume that black coaches comprise of less than 7% of all current coaches in English Football.  

 

With the numbers being what they are, several people have hypothesized why this is the case. One explanation is that only 10% of black soccer players in England are offered head coaching jobs after retirement, in comparison to 25% of white players who are offered coaching jobs post retirement (Liew, 2018).  This hypothesis has some validity because an emerging trend in the soccer world currently is for retired players to be offered assistant coaching jobs post retirement. Subsequently, they work their way through the ranks and if they are fortunate enough, make their way to the head coaching position. Didier Deschamps’ career epitomizes this journey. It began in 1998 when he captained France to their first ever World Cup win. Twenty years later, he would repeat the same feat, albeit from the sideline as the head coach. Without taking away from Deschamps’ accomplishments, it is easy to see that by the virtue of Deschamps’ whiteness, his journey to success was made smoother insofar as he had a one in four chance of being offered the head coaching job. In contrast, had he been black, his odds would change to one in ten. It does not take a betting man to see which odds are better. This is another example of how the underrepresentation of black coaches in English soccer takes place.

 

Another factor that contributes to the underrepresentation of black coaches is the small margin of error that black coaches are permitted. This is the case in the NFL, where since 1978 only sixteen teams have fired coaches with a winning record. Of the sixteen coaches, four were black (Berri, 2018). At first glance, the number does not suggest anything untoward. But if we also consider that only 17 black coaches have ever survived the entirety of an NFL regular season, a red flag goes off. When the dust settled, four of them were fired with a winning record. In sports, a coaches’ job security is dependent on the number of wins he or she produces. However, when one is black, it seems as if winning on its own is not enough.  In fact, the collective reality of black coaches in the NFL and English Soccer suggest a dismal outlook for aspiring black coaches in general as one’s chances of getting hired along with one’s margin of error resembles the chances of camel passing through a needle’s eyes.

 

Before the 2008 FIFA World Cup, ESPN did a mini documentary entitled, “Beautiful Game Turned Ugly: Racism in Europe's Soccer Arenas” (Olesegun, 2008). During the documentary, the narrator alluded to the fact that while an open display of bigotry by fans is taboo in American sporting arenas, it is common place in Europe (Olesegun, 2008). With this fact in mind, my focus on bigotry against black athlete’s centers on European Soccer. Displays of bigotry include making frequent monkey noises, overt racial chants and throwing bananas aimed in their direction (Cleland & Cashmore, 2018). When subjected to bigotry, different players react differently. Take Samuel Eto’o as an example, a Cameroonian striker for FC Barcelona, who was showered with racist chants during a match against Zaragoza. The pain inflicted by the barrage of racial abuse was more than Eto’o could endure. As a result, Eto’o uttered the famous phrase “no mas” and for a moment, refused to continue (Olesegun, 2008). Similarly, Marc Zoro, an Ivorian football player, after being racially abused during a game in the Italian top flight, took the ball up in a bid to end the game one and for all (Olesegun, 2008). In a ESPN interview, Zoro lamented that “he had had enough and he couldn’t take it anymore” (Olesegun, 2008). While Eto’o and Zoro responded to fans’ racial abuse by trying to end the game, Daniel Alves took an uncharacteristic response when it was his time to face the fire. A fan decided to throw a banana at Alves as he proceeded to take a corner kick. Alves decided to eat the banana, discard of the banana peel and carry on with the game. The video went viral all across the world, with fans and pundits alike lauding Alves for making light of a such a serious moment. Regardless of the player’s reaction towards racial discrimination, it in no way diminishes the pain and suffering caused by bigotry.

 

Openly displaying racism is not limited to fans, as there has been an abundance of examples citing racial abuse between athletes. The case of Louis Suarez and Patrice Evra immediately comes to mind. In an incident dating back as recently as 2011, Suarez was charged £40,000 in conjunction with an eight-game band for being found guilty racially abusing Evra (Cleland & Cashmore, 2014). Seven days later, another incident of racial discrimination took place between Anton Ferdinand and John Terry. A year-long court case ensued, at the end of which Terry was cleared of all changes. Nonetheless, Terry was fined £220,000 and a four-game band by the English Football Association (Cleland & Cashmore, 2014).

In fairness to European Soccer playing nations, they have recognized that racism is a problem and some have taken steps to correct the problem. As a result, ‘Kick It Out’ was launched in 1997 by the English Premier League in a bid to eradicate racism in the game (Cleland & Cashmore, 2014).  This initiative has also been adopted by UEFA and FIFA, which are the governing bodies for European and International football, respectively. FIFA took this initiative one step further before the World Cup in 2008, by announcing that any display of racism on the field by players or coaches will result in fines and loss of points (Olesegun, 2008). While these efforts must be commended, they do not provide any repercussion for fans who are notorious for racially abusing Black players.  

 

Sports has come a long way from being an all-white boys club so much so that the world has reached the point where people of color can participate freely on a “levelled” playing field. Yet, many sports still have a long way to go before they can claim to be race neutral and free of bigotry, whether it be personal and institutional.   

References

Berri, D. (2018). Forbs. Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/davidberri/2018/01/02/black-head-coaches-in-the-nfl-are-much-more-likely-to-be-fired-with-a-winning-record/#54e3121b1cb8

Munson, L. (1998). Sports Illustrated . Retrieved from Vault : https://www.si.com/vault/1998/05/04/242554/paternity-ward-fathering-out-of-wedlock-kids-has-become-commonplace-among-athletes-many-of-whom-seem-oblivious-to-the-legal-financial-and-emotional-consequences

Sengupta , A. (2014). Country cricket . Retrieved from Country cricket : http://www.cricketcountry.com/articles/cricketing-rifts-14-when-west-indies-made-greigs-life-miserable-for-using-word-grovel-13048

Cleland, J., & Ellis, C. (2014). Fans, racism and British football in the twenty-first century: The existence of a ‘colour-blind’ Ideology. Journal of Ethnic & Migration Studies, 40 (4), 638-654.

Liew , J. (2018). Independent . Retrieved from https://www.independent.co.uk/sport/football/news-and-comment/rooney-rule-black-managers-indisputable-data-football-jonathan-liew-a8379111.html

Mudede, C. (2017). The Stranger . Retrieved from https://www.thestranger.com/slog/2017/09/25/25432524/why-the-over-representation-of-black-americans-in-professional-sports-is-not-a-good-thing

olesegun. (2008). Youtube . Retrieved from https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=W-iRLmaZf4A

Primm , E., DuBois , S., & Regoli, R. (2007). An exercise in subtleties and the transmission. Journal of African American Studies , 11(3/4), 239-250.

Schmidt , A., & Coe, K. (2014). Old and new forms of racial bias in mediated sports commentary: The case of the national football league draft. Journal of Broadcasting & Electronic Media, 58(4), 655-670.

The Editors of Encyclopaedia Britannica. (n.d.). Encyclopaedia Britannica. Retrieved from https://www.britannica.com/biography/Frank-Worrell

Anchor 10
PSX_20180501_183205.jpg
Slide6.JPG

Where the Flowers Blossom

By Justin Moultrie

 

Justin Moultrie is 21 years, and was born in Nassau, NP. He is currently pursuing a career in art and plans to becoming a director of film in the future. His current focus is painting.

 

Summary

This piece is called "Where the flowers bloom" inspired by a song from Tyler the Creator. The piece is based on human perspective and how it affects our lives. The subject is painted in grey tones to represent the negative that affects us on the daily and how it can take away our positive outlook on live. This is juxtaposed by the flowers, which are all bright, vibrant hues, which represent life's good aspects. The work shows that even though we go through trials and tribulations we can always look forward to better opportunities. 

Anchor 11

 

Revolution: An Interpretation

By: Arvis Mortimer

Arvis Mortimer is a Public Health Professional specialized in intervention research, implementation, monitoring and evaluation

Summary

This video, as a personal project, seeks to contribute to the elimination of some forms of resistance - mental or other - that one may experience when hearing/seeing the word revolution. It endeavors to bring revolution out of the past and into the present...and show that social transformation is still possible, it doesn't have to be violent, and it can begin on the personal/individual level -progressing to the community level. This video also aspires to make 'revolution' relatable and in someway inspire the viewers to know that they are powerful...that their intentional and directed actions for good could lead to change.

Slide6.JPG
Anchor 12

 

 

 

 

Sankofa: a Mini-Collection

By: Jalan Harris

Jalan Harris is a mixed media artist and an organiser in the Bahamian arts community

Summary

These four pieces by Jalan Harris come together to impart the application of ancient wisdom of the Ancestors to modern day issues. Specifically, 'Murk' is a depiction of the tragedy of violence in the Caribbean; and the three pieces that follow are solutions to this and other modern issues, each a call to Sankofa, or looking back to go forward. In 'AFRO-Spiritual' (cover art), the third eye or spiritual self is highlighted; 'Madonna and Child' is a reference to the Black Madonna revered even to this day in certain Christian sects in Europe; and 'Umoja', which means 'Unity' in Swahili, is a call to join arms to bring forth the Healing.

Slide6.JPG
murk.jpg

Murk

tumblr_nczjonajcN1qg5xq9o1_1280.jpg

AFRO-Spiritual

20180308_095114.jpg

Madonna and Child

FB_IMG_1525702551745.jpg

Umoja

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

ABOUT US

JREVLIB was established in Nassau Bahamas by a cross-sectoral and international group of revolutionary scholars, it is contextualised by an urgent need to provide novel ideas and practical solutions for the economic and social liberation of peoples from the global south. 

JREVLIB distinguishes itself through its core tenets of accessibility and availability to the wider public, and its intentionality of purpose for creating and sharing concepts and knowledge related to the pursuit of revolution, liberty and dignity.

In this light, our mission is to facilitate a space for the presentation of revolutionary ideas that can be widely disseminated to the public. The end goal of this mission is to stimulate the organic ingenuity of readers and viewers, as well as our contributing writers, towards the coordinated, informed and evidence-based realisation of true revolutionary change, particularly in the global South.

The material published will be urgent and topical thereby facilitating discussion, debate and decision making for societal transformation.

Submissions are welcomed in a variety of formats (article, art, music, photography, video etc) and subject matters (law, science, history, philosophy, economics, spirituality etc), from both academic and non-academic contributors.

Please contact us at journalofrevolution@gmail.com if you are interested in contributing.

Also please check out our NEW web application the Seshat Public e-Library, where you will find our collection of e-books, and you can even contribute to our collection. Visit Seshat here: 

Slide6.JPG
Anchor 13
Slide6.JPG
  • facebook
  • twitter
  • linkedin

©2018 by JRevLib. Proudly created with Wix.com

bottom of page